Development of a tool kit for the child forensic interview to improve the collection of evidence

Background: The problem of interest is focusing on an increase for education within the forensic interviewing process for individuals within the multidisciplinary team and community stakeholders. The PICO question is: Does the development of an assessment tool kit for the child forensic interviewing process increase knowledge of qualified observations evidence by the multidisciplinary team and stakeholders. The Theoretical foundation for this research will aim to develop and present a toolkit that will enhance and positively affect the knowledge and practices of the forensic interview, based on the Iowa Method of Evidence-Based Practice and a Knowledge-to-Action structure.

Methods: Methods utilized a pre-survey, presentation, and post-survey; which entailed an example of setting the stage introduction, rapport, encouraged narrative, facilitators, interview instructions, narrative practices, and follow-up questioning. The analysis of the forensic interview consisted of a model structure in which the multidisciplinary team was given a pre-survey questioning acquired knowledge from previous education, a presentation entailing a structured conversation with a child intended to elicit detailed information about a possible event or events that the child has experienced or witnessed, and a post-survey that measured knowledge gained.

Results, conclusion, implications, and recommendations: The scholarly project gathered information through the pre/post surveys focusing on assessing the information interviewers typically review prior to conducting the forensic interview. The surveys revealed a lack of uniformity within the protocols and the preparation practice, as well as the observational viewers. Summary of data collected, there were limitations to the results which stemmed from a lag in the post survey sent out, as well as a decrease in response from the attendees. In conclusion, there was evidence of learning, which was observed through the results obtained.

The Pearson correlation was used with the result sought after to determine if there was a linear relationship between two quantitative variables, whether a positive or negative correlation. In this scholarly study, the variables were the pre and post survey measuring gain of knowledge by participants. Each question results were reviewed as data to the survey response, with a total of ten questions; both pre and post survey. The pre-survey there were 19 responses. The post-survey resulted in nine out of nineteen responses. Four questions had no statistical significance, however, the remaining questions relating to rapport with the child, impartial attitude, ground rules of the interview, appropriate process, open-ended questioning, and a value with discoverable evidence demonstrated a statistical significance.