This mixed methods research study sought to find solutions to teacher absenteeism and the lack of daily substitutes at the Canon-McMillan School District. The ability to fully staff when teacher absences occur a problem for the Canon-McMillan School District. The objectives of this study included: (a) exploring the relationship between staff absences pre- and post-pandemic, (b) exploring the relationship between fill rates of staff absences pre- and post-pandemic, (c) exploring the relationship between levels of satisfaction when serving as a day-to-day substitute teacher at the Canon-McMillan School District.
The results of this study indicated that when comparing pre- and post-pandemic staff absences, the number of staff absences post-pandemic was higher than pre-pandemic. The analysis revealed that fill rates were also higher post-pandemic at a fill rate of79%, while pre-pandemic, the fill rate was 77%. However, when comparing pre- and post- pandemic absences, post-pandemic absences were higher, and fill rates did not appear to rise as much. Ultimately, fill rates were proportional to the number of absences, and the end result was more substitute teachers were available post-pandemic. A Google Form Survey was sent to 288 substitute teachers, of which 72 responded, giving the researcher insight into the satisfaction of substitute teachers, areas of weaknesses, and areas upon which to improve. The responses were analyzed, and the researcher was able to formulate conclusions and provide operational and fiscal recommendations based on their findings.
The study aims to answer the following questions: How did the Block Schedule affect student grades during marking periods and at the end of the year? Did it influence the number of students scoring Advanced or Proficient on the Mathematics PSSA? How did math grades compare to other subjects taught traditionally? What was the impact on student discipline and attendance?
Data from PJHS’s student information system, including grades, PSSA scores, attendance, and discipline records, were analyzed. The comparison covers three years of the Traditional Schedule and four years of the Block Schedule, using statistical methods to evaluate the data.
Results indicated improvements in mathematics achievement under the Block Schedule, with higher marking period and year-end grades, and an increased number of students scoring Advanced or Proficient on the Mathematics PSSA. However, no significant changes were observed in discipline referrals or attendance rates.
The study provides insights into the academic benefits of block scheduling in mathematics and offers recommendations for further research.
Using a mixed-methods approach, the research gathered data through a survey and structured interviews. The survey employed Likert scales and multiple-choice questions to collect quantitative data, while interviews provided qualitative insights. Findings reveal significant gaps in several training areas, including SEL and equity, highlighting that current programs often lack depth and practical application.
The study identifies a need for more comprehensive, ongoing, and accessible professional development opportunities. Recommendations include addressing barriers to equitable training, developing sustained training sessions, and implementing practical support systems. By addressing these gaps, school districts can better equip their leaders to meet the diverse needs of their school communities and promote continuous improvement.
This research enhances the understanding of the professional development needs of K-12 principals and assistant principals in Pennsylvania and offers actionable recommendations for improving the effectiveness and equity of professional development opportunities.