2024 Doctoral Capstone Projects

Community colleges face unique challenges in educating students due to their open-access policies and the need to retain students through successful completion of courses, especially those identified as barrier courses. This study examined the impact of applying a mandatory tutoring requirement in a first-year writing course to increase course success rates and writing proficiencies. A Communications-121 writing course taught at a community college in Southeastern Pennsylvania was identified as one of the top 10 barrier courses with a low course success rate of 62%. In order to address this issue, a quasi-experimental study was designed to examine the impact of three different tutoring models on course success rates: mandatory, embedded, and voluntary. The study also explored the relationship between at-risk student populations (first-generation, ethnicity, and Pell Grant recipients) and the various tutoring models. The mandatory tutoring intervention used in this quantitative study was not shown to be the best model; however, there was a positive relationship between at-risk students and the mandatory tutoring model. Exit surveys also showed that a majority of students who used tutoring services reported that they would use a tutor in future courses and would recommend tutoring to their classmates.

This research project aimed to investigate the impact of Whole School Cluster Grouping on student achievement, student growth, and teacher efficacy. The primary purpose was
to explore innovative strategies to meet the diverse needs of all students in a comprehensive educational setting. The study employed a mixed-methods research design, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data to provide a holistic understanding of the intervention's effects. Pre- and post-intervention quantitative data were collected from standardized test scores in English Language Arts and mathematics across grades 1 through 4. Qualitative data were derived from teacher efficacy surveys and narrative responses, providing insights into teacher experiences and perceptions. The analysis included comparing pre- and post-intervention achievement and growth percentages, as well as examining changes in teacher efficacy ratings. The results of Whole School Cluster Grouping indicated mixed impacts on student achievement and positive impacts on student growth. Teacher efficacy showed marked improvement in areas such as student engagement, instructional strategies, and classroom management, suggesting that Whole School Cluster Grouping positively influenced teachers' confidence and effectiveness. Overall, the findings suggest that Whole School Cluster Grouping has the potential to enhance educational outcomes but requires careful implementation to address challenges and optimize its effectiveness.