admin
Thu, 03/28/2024 - 19:09
Edited Text
Historical Introduction Routes
of Invasive Plants to
Pennsylvania
Sarah Brown
Faculty Advisor: Cory Shoemaker, PhD
Issues with Invasives
• Introduction causes or is likely to cause
economic or environmental harm or harm to
human health
• Are the cause of 18% of endangered and
threatened species, have contributed to the
decline of 42%
• Harms agricultural productivity, public utility
operations, outdoor recreation, and property
values.
• $1.288 Trillion globally over the past 50 years
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY
Historical Invasion Routes
• Identifying introduction origins
• Conducive Habitats
• Vegetation morphology
Efforts Against Invasives
• Lack of established protocols
• Biological controls- chemical, mechanical,
biotic
• Monitoring efforts
• 1990- Invasives deemed a significant
component of environmental changes
Purpose
• Determine spread of invasive
species
• Reduce future invasions
• Identify possible advantages of
morphology
• Education
• <40% of PA consumers know
their plants are invasive
Elaeangnus
Umbellate
Autumn Olive
Pyrus calleryana
Bradford Pear
Vinca minor
Periwinkle
Hemerocallis fulva
Orange Daylily
Model Species
• Vegetation forms
• Horticultural status
• 174-23 samples
Hedera helix
English Ivy
Pueraria montana
Kudzu
Material and Methods
• Southeast Regional Network of Expertise and
Collections (SERNEC).
• 233 herbaria spanning 200 years
• 475 species
• Organization & Habitats
• Esri: GIS mapping software
• Callery pear, Bradford cultivar &
Montgomery county
Herbarium Records Pre-1850
Herbarium Records 1850-1875
Herbarium Records 1876-1900
Herbarium Records 1900-1926
Herbarium Records 1926-1950
Herbarium Records 1951-1975
Herbarium Records 1976-2000
Herbarium Records 2001-Present
Results
Historical Routes of Invasion
300
• 257 Human developed
• 101 Late successional
• 75 Early successional
• 42 Riparian zones
• Periwinkle vs Autumn Olive
• Orange daylily and Periwinkle
250
200
150
100
50
0
Human Developed
Riparian Zones
Early Successional
Late Successional
Error Sources & Future Endeavors
• Collector dispersal
• Accuracy of GPS
• Hydrogeological factors
• Source from other herbariums
• How are they spreading away
from human developed areas
Conclusions
• Human development
• What does this mean for the future?
• Box stores/ Conscious consumer/ Educate others.
References
•
•
•
•
•
Gagliardi, James A., and Mark H. Brand. “Connecticut Nursery and Landscape Industry
Preferences for Solutions to the Sale and Use of Invasive Plants.” HortTechnology, vol. 17, no. 1,
2007, pp. 39–45., doi:10.21273/horttech.17.1.39.
Kelley, Kathleen M., et al. “Invasive Plant Species: Results of a Consumer Awareness,
Knowledge, and Expectations Survey Conducted in Pennsylvania.” Journal of Environmental
Horticulture, vol. 24, no. 1, 2006, pp. 53–58., doi:10.24266/0738-2898-24.1.53.
Pisula, Nikki L., and Scott J. Meiners. “Relative Allelopathic Potential of Invasive Plant Species in
a Young Disturbed Woodland1.” The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, vol. 137,
no. 1, 2010, pp. 81–87., doi:10.3159/09-ra-040.1.
Seastedt, Timothy R. “Biological Control of Invasive Plant Species: a Reassessment for The
A. New Phytologist, vol. 205, no. 2, 2014, pp. 490–502.,
doi:10.1111/nph.13065.
“U.S. Forest Service.” Forest Service Shield, www.fs.fed.us/wildflowers/invasives/.
of Invasive Plants to
Pennsylvania
Sarah Brown
Faculty Advisor: Cory Shoemaker, PhD
Issues with Invasives
• Introduction causes or is likely to cause
economic or environmental harm or harm to
human health
• Are the cause of 18% of endangered and
threatened species, have contributed to the
decline of 42%
• Harms agricultural productivity, public utility
operations, outdoor recreation, and property
values.
• $1.288 Trillion globally over the past 50 years
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY
Historical Invasion Routes
• Identifying introduction origins
• Conducive Habitats
• Vegetation morphology
Efforts Against Invasives
• Lack of established protocols
• Biological controls- chemical, mechanical,
biotic
• Monitoring efforts
• 1990- Invasives deemed a significant
component of environmental changes
Purpose
• Determine spread of invasive
species
• Reduce future invasions
• Identify possible advantages of
morphology
• Education
• <40% of PA consumers know
their plants are invasive
Elaeangnus
Umbellate
Autumn Olive
Pyrus calleryana
Bradford Pear
Vinca minor
Periwinkle
Hemerocallis fulva
Orange Daylily
Model Species
• Vegetation forms
• Horticultural status
• 174-23 samples
Hedera helix
English Ivy
Pueraria montana
Kudzu
Material and Methods
• Southeast Regional Network of Expertise and
Collections (SERNEC).
• 233 herbaria spanning 200 years
• 475 species
• Organization & Habitats
• Esri: GIS mapping software
• Callery pear, Bradford cultivar &
Montgomery county
Herbarium Records Pre-1850
Herbarium Records 1850-1875
Herbarium Records 1876-1900
Herbarium Records 1900-1926
Herbarium Records 1926-1950
Herbarium Records 1951-1975
Herbarium Records 1976-2000
Herbarium Records 2001-Present
Results
Historical Routes of Invasion
300
• 257 Human developed
• 101 Late successional
• 75 Early successional
• 42 Riparian zones
• Periwinkle vs Autumn Olive
• Orange daylily and Periwinkle
250
200
150
100
50
0
Human Developed
Riparian Zones
Early Successional
Late Successional
Error Sources & Future Endeavors
• Collector dispersal
• Accuracy of GPS
• Hydrogeological factors
• Source from other herbariums
• How are they spreading away
from human developed areas
Conclusions
• Human development
• What does this mean for the future?
• Box stores/ Conscious consumer/ Educate others.
References
•
•
•
•
•
Gagliardi, James A., and Mark H. Brand. “Connecticut Nursery and Landscape Industry
Preferences for Solutions to the Sale and Use of Invasive Plants.” HortTechnology, vol. 17, no. 1,
2007, pp. 39–45., doi:10.21273/horttech.17.1.39.
Kelley, Kathleen M., et al. “Invasive Plant Species: Results of a Consumer Awareness,
Knowledge, and Expectations Survey Conducted in Pennsylvania.” Journal of Environmental
Horticulture, vol. 24, no. 1, 2006, pp. 53–58., doi:10.24266/0738-2898-24.1.53.
Pisula, Nikki L., and Scott J. Meiners. “Relative Allelopathic Potential of Invasive Plant Species in
a Young Disturbed Woodland1.” The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, vol. 137,
no. 1, 2010, pp. 81–87., doi:10.3159/09-ra-040.1.
Seastedt, Timothy R. “Biological Control of Invasive Plant Species: a Reassessment for The
A. New Phytologist, vol. 205, no. 2, 2014, pp. 490–502.,
doi:10.1111/nph.13065.
“U.S. Forest Service.” Forest Service Shield, www.fs.fed.us/wildflowers/invasives/.