Nursing (Doctor of Nursing Practice)

Background: Substance use disorders have increased in the U.S. in the past 20 years, with opioid abuse causing over 70,000 deaths from 1999 to 2019. The growing public health problem necessitates developing a patient-centered educational toolkit. Patients on benzodiazepines who are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality are not engaged in their benzodiazepine management and need a specific educational tool to provide the necessary knowledge for medication management. In addition, there is currently no patient education to improve benzodiazepine safety or evidence-based program to enhance the partnership between the prescriber and the patient in many offices. Method/Design: The investigator developed an evidence-based patient education toolkit to enhance patients' knowledge about the safe use of Benzodiazepines and the risks of chronic Benzodiazepine use. Forty-one participants completed a voluntary pre, and post-survey focused on benzodiazepine-related knowledge and willingness to decrease or cease use. This improvement project aimed to (i) educate and improve the patients' understanding of safe Benzodiazepine use. (ii) Increase patient's readiness to decrease or ease long-term Benzodiazepine use. Participants: A convenient sample of 41 patients prescribed benzodiazepines at the behavioral health clinic was selected. Results: Results of linear regression indicated that patients improved their knowledge regarding safe benzodiazepine use after using the patient-centered toolkit. However, no statistically significant changes were observed in patient willingness to decrease or cease benzodiazepine use. Conclusion: The patient-centered toolkit is useful in improving patient knowledge regarding safe usage of benzodiazepines. However, the toolkit was not beneficial in changing the patients’ willingness to cease or decrease benzodiazepine usage. Nevertheless, findings are helpful in nursing practice and should be used to inform current practice. Future investigators should improve the toolkit by completing projects focused on how the toolkit can be made more effective or used in more focused interventions.

Clinical inertia is the failure to initiate or intensify treatment in a timely manner in people with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care (PC) where collaborative care can be an approach to overcome inertia. Diabetes care network (DCN) is a telehealth based collaborative care model to address clinical inertia in the PC environment. In DCN, initial care was delivered via E-Consult by hub diabetes team for Veterans with A1c of 9% or higher and the longitudinal collaborative care delivered by PC liaison with weekly team huddle. To study the difference in the clinical outcomes with DCN vs PC practices, we compared the DCN cohort (97.7% male, 90.8% white, with a mean age 67.2 (8.9), with a PC cohort (100% male, 94.9% white, mean age: 68 year (10.5), with A1C >9%). Methods: Means (SD), frequencies. and percentages were presented. The DCN cohort had a significant decline in the baseline A1C of 10.2% (1.4), to 8.1% (0.99), 7.6% (0.96), 7.5 % (0.86) at 3, 6, and 12 months while A1c in PC cohort stayed poor with baseline A1C of 10.1% (0.89), to 10.2% (1.69), 9.7% (1.74) and, 9.5% (1.83) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients who achieved A1c less than 8% in DCN cohort were 38 (43.6%), 56 (64%), and 56 (64%) at 3, 6, and 12 months and were 1(1.7%), 5(8.5%), and 6(10.2%) at 3, 6, and 12 months in PC cohort. An A1c of less than 7% was achieved in DCN cohort in 10 (11.4%), 21 (24.1%), and 23 (26.4%) patients at 3, 6, and 12 months and only 1(1.7%), 0(0%), and 0(0%) patients achieved A1c less than 7% at 3, 6, and 12 months in PC cohort. Our study shows participation in the DCN telehealth program for 1 year was associated with significant improvement in A1c. This improvement was not seen within the PC with traditional care practices. Thus, addressing clinical inertia in PC will need a paradigm shift in current practices. The proposed collaborative approach of DCN can overcome clinical inertia in PC and improve care for people with T2D by supporting PC access to specialty care expertise, decreasing the burden of diabetes care for patients and PC providers.

Background: According to the Centers for Disease Control, (CDC, 2018) at least thirty percent of outpatient antibiotics are unnecessary. A retrospective 2018 study by Incze, M.A., Redberg, R.F. and Katz, M. found forty nine percent of antibiotic prescriptions in the urgent care setting were for inappropriate diagnosis. The aim of this study was to educate providers on one method of reducing antibiotic prescriptions and incorporate new patient instructions into the electronic health record. Participants included physicians associates and nurse practitioners.
Methods: The Quality improvement approach of Plan Do Study Act was utilized for this project. A literature review was completed to study methods of antibiotic stewardship. The electronic health record system was queried for delayed prescribing discharge instructions. Informal discussions among providers revealed absence of a cohesive approach to reducing unnecessary prescriptions for antibiotics.

Interventions: A PowerPoint was emailed to all providers on the use of delayed prescribing for antibiotics along with a Likert-Scale survey on provider perceptions of implementation. New instructions for patients on delayed prescribing of antibiotics was added to the existing electronic health record system. For a period of 30 days the number of times delayed prescribing instructions sheets were printed for patients was monitored along with the number of patients seen at each location. The provider survey was also reviewed.

Results: Provider survey demonstrated favorable attitudes toward antibiotic stewardship. The delayed prescribing instruction set was utilized twenty-seven times over the thirty-day period. There were 2,579 patient encounters during the study for a 0.9% utilization rate.

Conclusions: This was a new process in the clinic where the study was completed and though the utilization was low there was favorable consensus among providers on the value of antibiotic stewardship. There are many opportunities going forward including tracking diagnosis codes along with antibiotic prescriptions and following up to determine how many delayed prescriptions were filled. This research can provide a starting point for any outpatient facility looking to decrease rates of antibiotic prescribing.

Patients who are receiving comfort-directed care at the end of their lives will be cared for by nurses throughout their hospital stay. Providing bedside end-of-life care requires specialty assessment, communication, and intervention skills. Nurses who provide bedside end-of-life care in the acute care setting may not receive specialty palliative care training as part of their undergraduate education. To address this an educational curriculum was designed by members of the Palliative Care team and a Palliative Superuser training program was developed. Guided by the Comfort ALways Matters (CALM) framework the course focused on specialized assessment and symptom management, holistic approaches to patients and their caregivers, and communication instruction. Course description is a four-hour workshop presented by certified registered nurse practitioners from the inpatient palliative care team. Nurses who complete the superuser training will act as mentors to their peers and will continue to receive educational updates every two months. A goal of training ten percent of nurses in the acute hospital setting was set. Individual class size is limited to 10 attendees to facilitate small group discussion. Program availability was advertised by email and flyer to the managers of all inpatient units. Nurses who expressed interest and volunteered to attend were chosen by their managers and enrolled in the class. Pre- and post- testing of nurses who volunteered for the training revealed improvement in knowledge, confidence, and comfort in providing end of life care after completing the initial training session. Early positive results of the QI initiative suggested that ongoing training will be valuable to the institution and the patients.

Problem Statement: According to the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force (2018), Falls are the leading cause of injury that are related to morbidity and mortality among older adults in the United States. In 2014, about 28.7% of adults aged 65 years or older had a history of fall resulting in 29 million falls in which about 37.5% required medical treatment or encountered restricted activity for a day or more while an estimated 33 000 resulted in death in 2015 (USPSTF, 2018). This is estimated to increase to seven falls per day by 2030 which makes it an important topic to address (CDC, 2021).
Objectives: The purpose of this project was to improve safety by conducting a retrospective review of a Quality improvement (QI) measures of an evidence-based fall prevention program in Assisted Living. PICO research question was identified as P- Older adult residents, I- Evidence Based Fall Prevention Guideline C- Comparing before and after fall prevention programs, O- Decrease in falls.
Methods: This research was completed in Southern New Jersey, United States. Participants were required to be at least 65 years of age and older. The squire guideline 2.0 was well used in this QI article. This study evaluated a QI fall prevention protocol of Physical Therapy (PT) that was instituted in the Assisted Living Facility (ALF). Data were obtained from EHR and paper records. For the purpose of this study, fall was defined as an inpatient’s unknowing, sudden drop to the floor with or without injury, regardless of height of drop, whether assisted or unassisted to the floor (NDNQI, 2020). A weekly number of falls were retrieved 6 weeks before intervention and 6 weeks after. Data was analyzed using t-test to compare outcomes and propose policy change.
Intervention: The IOWA model was used to do a retrospective review of the success of the program. It was used at the beginning of the QI project as a foundation for the project. The Iowa Model helped direct decision-making and EBP process from both the clinician and system’s point of view (Iowa Model Collaborative, 2017). This 12-week fall prevention program focused on falls before and after physical therapy for individuals 65 years and above. The EBP fall prevention program of PT was instituted during week 7 and monitored by all team members.
Result and Conclusion: Using the paired t-test analysis, findings revealed a significant difference in pre and post intervention of p< 0.05. There was a decrease in the number of falls post intervention when compared to pre-intervention data. All data are presented in graphs, charts and tables for description. This paper has about 51 pages including references and appendix with tables and graphs of statistical importance. All tables and graphs are original work of the authors. The pages can be reduced as the reference pages currently list all tables, graphs and figures already used in the body of the article. Given the large audience to your publication, this article will be very valuable to your professionals. It will help educate them or reinforce knowledge on how to reduce injury and high cost of care that are incurred from falls, and improve overall safety.

Overweight and Obesity is defined, according to the CDC, as a weight higher than what is considered healthy for a given height (CDC, 2021). This is calculated using a screening tool for overweight and obesity. Overweight is regarded as a BMI of 25-30, and obesity is greater than 30. The latest data shows that adult overweight and obesity is increasing and has become a major global epidemic. Overweight and Obesity is a very complex health issue that has resulted from a combination of factors, including behaviors. This includes poor dietary patterns and inactivity. Lack of education in healthy nutrition is one of the issues contributing to overweight and obese adults. Other reasons can be psychosocial barriers that can include fear of judgment and uncertainty about the process of seeking help if one is obese. Other obstacles can consist of time commitment and the cost of programs. Being overweight and obese can lead to increased health risks like diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and certain cancers. According to the CDC, obesity is also associated with the leading causes of death in the United States (CDC, 2021). With this comes a significant economic impact as well. This small pilot study used participants in a brief online asynchronous. The criteria were people ages 18-65. Each volunteer participant gave written consent to participate and be evaluated during the program. Each volunteer participant answered the preprogram questionnaire, watched the virtually based PowerPoint presentation linked under YouTube, and then answered the same questionnaire to assess their new knowledge and willingness to change to a healthier lifestyle. The General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire was the tool used for evaluation. This questionnaire is a valid measure of nutrition knowledge that is consistent and reliable.

The virus responsible for Covid-19, acknowledged as a public health threat, has been causing global disease since it was first discovered in December 2019 in China. The CDC (2021) issued a call for action through its Science Agenda for Covid-19 to identify evidence-based interventions for interrupting disease progression in vulnerable populations such as those in emergency shelter settings.

This project focused on Covid-19 and its impact on the homeless population in northwestern Pennsylvania. The theoretical framework was the John Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model (JHEBP). A survey collected self-reported data on the practice and barriers to using personal non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). Participants were adults ages 18 and over in one of two emergency shelters on the data collection date.