Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania The State System of Higher Education ANTHR OPOS - The Anthropology Newsletter March 2000 Vol. 24 No. 4 Fall 2000: In the Fall 2000 semester, the Department of Anthropology will offer the following courses: Anthropology & World Problems (46.102) meets the Values, Ethics & Responsible Decision-Making requirement. 46.101 Intro to Anthropology 46.102 Anthropology & World Problems 46.200 Principles of Cultural Anthropology 46.210 World Prehistory 46.220 Human Origins 46.300 Archaeological Method & Theory :46.312 South American Archaeology 46.320 Contemporary World Cultures 46.340 Native North America 46.385 Anthropology Research& Writing The following courses meet the university's diversity requirement: 46.101, 46.102, 46.200, and 46.320. Some More Information: All of the courses listed above meet the university's Group B distribution requirements for General Education. Majors, Take Note: 46.385, Anthropology Research & Writing, is now a required course for anthropology majors. Self-Serving Advertisement: 46.320, Contemporary World Cultures, will be taught in the Fall 2000 semester as Peoples and Cultures of the Caribbean. The course will examine the In - This Issue: Living in Mongolia - p. 2 Archaeology in Oklahoma - p.3 More Lithics - p. 4 Women in Combat-p. 5 Man the Hunter? - p. 6 geography, prehistory, and history of the Caribbean region, as well as contemporary social and cultural patterns there. Family life, religion, the arts, language, and a host of other features of daily life in the West Indies will be discussed. There will be a more in-depth look at three prominent islands in the Caribbean - Cuba, Jamaica, and Trinidad. Tourism and development issues will also be discussed. The course will be offered by Dr. Minderhout TuTh from 2 to 3:15. Living in Mongolia: by Andrea Gonce. (Andrea is a 1998 BU graduate; she is currently serving in the Peace Corps in Mongolia. She e-mailed this article for the newsletter from there.) Through my frozen eyelashes, I saw a Mercedes--Benz with twenty sheep carcasses drive past today on my way to the coffee shop. I gave a little chuckle and thought that · perhaps just the cold weather was getting to me; something has got to happen at -40C, although the carcass thing happens too often. While in Mongolia, I have discovered, among other things, that I have a terrible aversion to mutton. But food is not the only thing here. Although my anthropology classes at BU were amazing, they could never have prepared me for some of the things I have experienced and seen here. I am one of the seventy-two Peace Corps volunteers serving in Mongolia. I am living in the capital city, Ulaanbaatar. I am not, however, living in a dirt and mud hut that the typical Peace Corps volunteer is supposed to experience. There is a nice apartment for me with hot running water and even a refrigerator - though I'm not living in it at the moment. I've been in the sauna room for the past week while they re-plaster my ceiling. My job is at the Emergency Medical Services Center - the 911 of Mongolia. You could dial 103 while in the city, ask for Andrea, and, more often than not, I would be there to take your call. On a typical day, about three hundred and fifty people pick up their telephones and dial 103. They are dialing 103 seeking medical assistance for a multitude of difficulties ranging from high blood pressure to a potentially broken leg caused by falling off a horse. It is the job ofone of fifteen physicians working that day to respond and provide medical assistance to the best of their knowledge. Because of the many calls the Center receives, as well as 2 distance, it may take upwards of twenty-five minutes for a doctor to arrive. Upon arrival, the doctor gives the highest quality care he or she can, and in some cases, has the patient taken to a facility for further treatment. The Center's staff works in four twenty-four hour shifts; the staff includes physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and drivers. The days are long, and various calls are received. For example, one physician, named Santugs, in a nine hour period visited fourteen patients with problems such as the following: faintness, abdominal pain, vomiting, car accident/fractured knee, loss of consciousness, hypertension, and chest pain. The Center is not without its difficulties. It has been in the process of introducing modern and progressive methods during the new era of democracy. The doctors are trained in one of the following specialties: internal medicine, cardiology, trauma, psychiatry, neurology, and maternity. The problem is, however, that all doctors have to respond to emergency calls regardless of their specialties. The second major difficulty that the Center faces is lack of Western medical materials needed to provide appropriate emergency care. Equipment carried by doctors or ambulances is limited to various types of medicines, injection equipment, maternity equipment, a blood pressure cuff, and a stethoscope. The differences between American-run and Mongolian ambulances are vast. I am learning from the Mongolians, and at the same time, I am teaching them. I will be working with the Center for the next year and a half, going on the ambulance calls with the doctors as well as teaching English. Perhaps one day, after returning to the United States, I, too, will pile my car high with meat. Archaeology in Oklahoma: (The following is from the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History. Karin Rebnegger is a former anthropology major and a 1997 graduate of BU; she is currently a graduate student in anthropology at the University of Oklahoma.) "A 1,500 to 1, 700-year-old campsite in Roger Mills County of western Oklahoma currently is attracting the attention of archaeology graduate students Karin Rebnegger, Stance Hurst, and Beau Schriever and museum archaeology curator Don Wyckof£ 3 Discovered and recorded over a decade ago, archaeological site 34RM-507 appeared to be a badly eroded, temporary camp where prehistoric Native Americans were making various tools from quartzite cobbles collected from a nearby deposit of Ogallala Formation graveL Broken and worn-out spearpoints found there are of a comer-notched style thought used around 1,500 years ago. Although the site was inspected occasionally since its dis•covery, every visit' s findings seemed consistent with the location being a temporary stone-working camp that was virtually eroded away. Ideas about the site changed last spring when Wyckoff took his Lithic Technology class to visit it and to plot in any newly exposed artifacts. By this time, erosion was exposing several areas of concentrated, fire-cracked rock and occasional bone fragments. Most exciting, however, was the discovery of partially completed stone tools, datable charcoal, and the remnants of some kind of pit eroding from recently cut banks of the adjacent creek. Students Rebnegger and Hurst expressed interest in helping document these finds, and Rebnegger indicated her interest in analyzing all the artifacts and preparing a report for publication. Landowner Pete Thurmond was amenable to the project, and so with funds from an anonymous donor, Rebnegger will spend the 1999-2000 academic year on the analysis and writing. The site was extensively mapped in the spring, and recently it was revisted and more artifacts, the rock features and the pit were mapped. Contents of the possible pit were removed for flotation of plant and animal remains. Wyckoff, Thurmond and graduate student Debra Bradley are undertaking a detailed study of the deeply stratified alluvial sediments under the site as part of their continued effort to document landscape and climatic changes over the past 25,000 years." The article includes a picture of Karin working at the site. More Lithics: The March 14, 2000 issue of The Philadelphia Inquirer contains an article about University of Pennsylvania anthropologist Jim Mathieu and his Technical Archaeology class. In technical archaeology, students reconstruct prehistoric tools and use them in real-life situations to see what humans in the past experienced in their everyday lives. 4 In this particular case, Matheiu and his class cut down two trees on the Penn campus using a 6000year-old stone ax from the collection of the Museum of Pennsylvania and a replica of a 3500-year-old bronze ax based on an artifact collected in England. The trees were to be cut down anyway to make room for a construction project on campus. Mathieu also had on hand a steelheaded ax purchased from Home Depot. The students took turns chopping with the various axes to see the differences in fee 1 and cut. It quickly became apparent that the eight-year-old wooden handle of the stone ax was not going to stand up to the task, so attention shifted to the bronze one. As Mathieu is quoted as saying, "You start thinking about the blisters they got. You start putting yourself in their place." It took 26 minutes for the bronze ax to cut the first tree and 33 minutes for the second. Though the article does not say how big the trees were, the pictures accompanying the text suggest that they were 18-20 inches in diameter. According to Mathieu, only 10 or so people now alive had used a bronze ax before the tree-felling at the University. By the end of the afternoon, that number had swelled to 17. Why Do Some Societies Allow Women to Participate in Combat?: U.S. women can serve in the military, but usually are excluded from combat. Some women feel that such exclusion is unfair and decreases their chances of promotion in the military. Other people, including some women, insist that female participation in combat would be detrimental to military performance or is inappropriate to women. Why then do some societies allow women to be warriors? Anthropologist David Adams compared 70 preindustrial societies to try and answer that question. Although most societies exclude women from war, Adams found that women were active warriors, at ·least occasionally, in 13% of the sample societies. In native North America, such societies included the Comanche, Crow, Delaware, Fox, Gros Ventre, and Navaho. In the Pacific, there were active warrior women among the Maori of New Zealand, on Majuro in the Marshall Islands, and among the Orokaiva of New Guinea. In none of these societies were the warriors 5 usually women, but women were allowed to engage in combat if they wanted to . . How are the societies with women warriors different from those that exclude women from combat? They differ in one of two ways. Either they conduct war only against people in other societies (Adams calls this "purely external war") or they marry entirely within their own community. Adams argues that these two conditions, which are not particularly common, preclude the possibility of conflicts of interest between wives and husbands, and therefore women can be permitted to engage in combat because their interests are the same as their husbands'. Because marriages in most cases involve individuals from the same society, husbands and wives will have the same loyalties if the society has purely external war. And even if war occurs between communities and larger groups in the same society (what Adams calls "internal war") there will be no conflict of interest between husband and wife if they both grew up in the same community. By contrast, there is internal war at least occasionally in most societies, and wives usually marry in from other communities. In this situation, there may often be a conflict of interest between husband and wife; if women were to engage in combat, they might have to fight against their fathers, uncles, and brothers. And wouldn't we expect the wives to try and warn kin in their home communities if the husbands planned to attack them? Indeed, the men's likely fear of their wives' disloyalty would explain why women in most societies are forbidden to make or handle weapons or to go near meetings in which war plans are being discussed. Many countries today engage in purely external war, so other things being equal, we would not expect conflicts of interest to impede women's participation in combat. Therefore, extrapolating from Adams' findings, we might expect that the barriers against female participation in combat will disappear eventually. But other conditions may have to be present before women and men participate equally in combat. In Adams' study, not all societies with purely external war or intracommunity marriage had women warriors. So we may also have to consider the degree to which a society seeks to maximize reproduction (and therefore protect women from danger) and the degree to which 6 the society depends on women for subsistence during wartime. Adams is looking at other questions as well. They include whether military participation increases women's participation in politics and whether women's participation in the military changes the nature of war. Man the Hunter or Woman the Gatherer?: Anthropologists know that it is important to understand the foraging or hunter/gatherer way of life, for all humans were foragers until 10,000 years ago. Foraging is a lifestyle in which humans collect their food from the wild; no plants are cultivated, nor are animals (with the exception of the dog) domesticated. Anthropology, the study of humans, has long focused on foraging since humans developed into the physical, cultural, and psychological beings that we are today while living as foragers. One important social feature that presumably developed out of foraging was the sexual division of labor. In most foraging societies, men specialize in one aspect of food production, and women in another. What then is relative contribution of each of the sexes to the total amount of food consumed? An important conference was held in 1966 to bring together anthropologists of all types to discuss what was known about foragers. Organized by Richard Lee and Irven DeVore, the conference and resulting book were called Man the Hunter. At the time, the word "man" was used widely in anthropology as a way of referring to humans in general. But referring to man the hunter appeared to ignore women, since women rarely do the hunting among foragers in the historical . era. It was not that women's contribution was entirely ignored by the contributors to Man the Hunter. Indeed, Richard Lee pointed out that some foragers, such as the !Kung of southwest Africa depended mostly on gathering, which was mainly women's work. Even so, the title of the conference and the book conveyed that hunting, and the work of men, was most important among foragers. With the growing women's movement in the United States, thinking in anthropology subsequently began to change. New questions began to be asked. What were women doing in foraging cultures? How much did they contribute to subsistence and other essential economic 7 activities? How much time did they work? What were their views of the world? What kinds of mate choices did they make? How much influence did women have? Collectors or Foraging Humans might not be as catchy as Man the Hunter or Woman the Gatherer., but it would be more gender-fair. In 1981, a book edited by Frances Dahlberg appeared. It was titled Woman the Gatherer. The editor was well aware that gathering may not be the most important subsistence activity among all foragers. It appears to be more ii:iiportant than hunting among contemporary foragers such as the !Kung and Australian aborigines who live in warmer climates. But gathering is less important in colder climates, where most recent foragers have lived. Indeed, if a large sample of recent foragers is examined, we find that fishing is often the most important subsistence activity, more important in providing calories than either hunting or gathering. Why the title.Woman the Gatherer then? Although the editor did not say so explicitly, it is clear that the title was intended to raise consciousness about the importance of women. We now know that foraging societies show considerable variability in how they get their food. Neither "Man the Hunter" nor "Woman the Gatherer" accurately describes most foragers. A book title such as Food 8