DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Developing Positive Teacher-Student Relationships In a Distance Learning Classroom Environment A Doctoral Capstone Project Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies and Research Department of Education In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education Lynette R. Waller California University of Pennsylvania August 2021 i DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING © Copyright by Lynette Raynel Waller All Rights Reserved August 2021 ii DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING iv Dedication This capstone is dedicated to my family, whose love and support carried me through this journey. To my mother, Karen Fisher, for making so many sacrifices over the years. Your love for our family is unending and felt in your words and actions. To my sister, Lori-Tannise Reavis, for being the most encouraging sister and friend. Thank you for always letting me be me. To my daughters, Cheyanne Waller and Kylee Waller, thank you for your love, encouragement, and understanding as I worked through long nights and weekends. At times, it felt like your belief in me was greater than my own. I hope I make you proud. To my loving husband, Frederick Waller, who has supported me through every step in this journey. I appreciate all that you have done and sacrificed to help me to the finish line. Thank you for always providing space for me to accomplish my goals. Whenever I was tired, discouraged, or frustrated, you always found a way to lift me up and help me get back on track. Thank you for believing in me and being my rock. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING v Acknowledgements I would like to thank my capstone committee chairperson, Dr. Mary Wolf for your guidance and encouragement throughout this journey. The support you provided made the entire process manageable and achievable. Thank you to my external committee member, Dr. Jayne Leh, for your insight, feedback, and encouragement. Your supportive guidance pushed me beyond what I thought was possible. Thank you to Dr. Shelby Cunningham, for your friendship and for providing a listening ear and calming presence when I felt overwhelmed. Thank you to Dr. Janette Hewitt for being the first person to believe in me. You mentored me through every aspect of school leadership and always encouraged me to go further. Everything I know, I learned from watching you. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Table of Contents Dedication iv Acknowledgements v List of Tables ix Abstract x CHAPTER I. Introduction 1 Background 1 Capstone Focus 2 Research Questions 3 Expected Outcomes 4 Fiscal Implications 4 Summary 4 CHAPTER II. Literature Review 6 Belonging 7 Interpersonal Teacher-Student Relationships 9 The Need for Positive Teacher-Student Relationships 10 Influence on Elementary Students 13 Influence on Diverse Student Groups 14 Implications for Preservice Teachers 18 Cultural Responsiveness Models of Cultural Responsiveness 21 23 Teacher-Student Relationships and Distance Learning 25 Distance Learning Strategies for Preservice Teachers 31 vi DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Summary 35 CHAPTER III. Methodology 37 Purpose 39 Setting and Participants 40 Intervention and Research Plan 44 Fiscal Implications 45 Research Design, Methods and Data Collection 46 Validity 57 Summary 57 CHAPTER IV. Data Analysis and Results 59 Pre-Intervention Data Results 61 Pre-Intervention Interviews 62 Pre-Intervention Observations 68 Pre-Intervention Journal Reflections 71 Professional Learning 75 Post-Intervention Results 76 Post-Intervention Interviews 76 Post-Intervention Observations 81 Post-Intervention Journal Reflections 86 Perception Changes from Pre-Intervention to Post-Intervention 89 Discussion 92 Summary 92 CHAPTER V. Conclusions and Recommendations 94 vii DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Conclusions 94 Research Question 1 94 Research Question 2 97 Research Questions 3 98 Application for Teacher Preparation Programs 101 Fiscal Implications 102 Limitations 102 Recommendations for Future Research 104 Summary 106 References 107 APPENDIX A. IRB Approval 129 APPENDIX B. Participant Informed Consent Form 130 APPENDIX C. Pre-Intervention Interview Questions 132 APPENDIX D. Post-Intervention Interview Questions 133 APPENDIX E. Observation Rubric 134 viii DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING ix List of Tables Table 1. Intervention Strategies for Building Positive Teacher-Student Relationships 50 Table 2. Data Collection Timeline 55 Table 3. Participant Experience Interacting with Elementary Students 63 Table 4. Level of Confidence in Developing Positive Relationships with Students 66 Table 5. Pre-Intervention Level of Confidence During Distance Learning 67 Table 6. Pre-intervention Strategy Use 70 Table 7. Post-Intervention Level of Confidence During Distance Learning 81 Table 8. Strategy Use During Intervention 82 Table 9. Post Intervention Strategy Use 84 Table 10. Level of Confidence Change Before and After Intervention 90 Table 11. Strategy Use Before, During, and After Intervention 91 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING x Abstract The purpose of this research study was to gain insight into the perceptions and the degree to which preservice teachers implement relationship-building strategies to foster positive teacher-student relationships within a distance learning environment. The research focused on creating a supportive classroom environment to facilitate student success, encourage a positive rapport and a sense of belonging, and develop the ability of preservice teachers to engage students during distance learning. The participants in this action research study were preservice teachers assigned to an urban elementary school setting during their student teaching placement. The action research study implemented a mixed-methods approach to gather data using interviews, observations, and journal reflections. The intervention engaged the study participants as a community of learners to identify strategies for building positive teacher-student relationships and to determine how the strategies could be integrated into the distance learning classroom environment. This research study provided compelling evidence to support the notion that focused instruction on relationship-building strategies improves the confidence and ability of preservice teachers to develop and maintain positive relationships within a distance learning classroom environment. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 1 CHAPTER ONE Introduction Providing a supportive classroom environment is a critical factor for the academic, social, and emotional development of students. A supportive classroom environment emphasizes trust and acceptance to facilitate active engagement and participation. This type of classroom has a caring teacher who places the relationship with students as a priority by demonstrating warmth and genuine interest in the students’ well-being. When this is in place, a community of learners is established between the teacher and students through authentic and trusting relationships, and students are engaged in positive interactions with the teacher and one another. During the past year, the need for positive classroom environments has increased due to the isolation experienced by students during the COVID-19 pandemic and the abrupt transition to remote learning. As a result, teachers must now develop positive relationships with students in a distance learning environment, which requires more deliberate teacher actions. As veteran teachers grapple with this new role, novice teachers are also being challenged to learn and implement relationship-building strategies in this new environment. Therefore, what steps should teacher preparation programs take to prepare preservice teachers to create a supportive learning environment while teaching remotely? Background For the past twenty years, I have worked with and supervised teachers across grade levels and in both urban and suburban school districts. One thing I have consistently observed is the importance of the relationship and rapport between the teacher and students. When students have a teacher who demonstrates care and concern DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 2 and establishes a classroom environment that is supportive, they tend to have a positive view of school and demonstrate academic, social, and emotional growth. For every teacher who effectively establishes a positive and supportive classroom environment, there are other teachers who struggle. So what can these differences be attributed to, is it skill, knowledge, or innate ability? As an instructor and supervisor of preservice teachers during their field placement and student teaching experience, I am interested in researching how the skill of creating a supportive classroom environment develops with preservice teachers, especially within the distance learning classroom setting. Capstone Focus Establishing and maintaining a supportive classroom environment requires a concerted effort on the part of the teacher to create the classroom culture of care, support, and interest in the growth and development of the students. This need for a supportive classroom environment with positive teacher-student relationships has become even more important as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on in-person instruction. In addition to developing a supportive classroom culture, teachers have been tasked with providing distance learning as the mode of instruction. This has created an additional layer of complexity for novice teachers entering the profession. Through my work with preservice teachers to establish positive teacher-student relationships in the classroom, I have observed that many of them confuse being friendly with having a positive teacher-student relationship. Because of this, I believe there needs to be an increased emphasis on preparing preservice teachers with the skills necessary to establish, develop, and maintain positive relationships for belonging and connectedness within a distance learning classroom environment. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 3 The challenge for preservice teachers is having the ability and confidence to create a classroom environment that promotes a sense of belonging and welcomes diversity. The majority of preservice teachers are White, middle-class, and feel uncomfortable teaching in urban communities with ethnically and culturally diverse student populations (Martin & Williams-Dixon, 1994). This is especially true for preservice teachers placed in an urban setting for the student teaching placement. The cultural and demographic differences along with the urban school setting can impact the preservice teachers’ confidence in their ability to develop positive relationships with the students and to develop a supportive classroom culture. Without the ability and confidence, the preservice teachers will likely struggle to develop a supportive classroom environment and the academic, social, and emotional growth of the students may be hindered greatly. Therefore, this action research will study how White preservice elementary teachers develop and implement instructional practices that support positive teacher-student relationships within a distance learning environment. Research Questions The purpose of this study is to inform the instructional programming for preservice teachers by identifying the current utilization of relationship-building strategies during remote learning to create a supportive classroom environment, the indicators of emerging positive teacher and student relationships, and the impact remote learning has on the development of positive classroom relationships. The following research questions will be the focus of the study: 1. How do preservice teachers perceive the importance of relationship-building strategies when delivering distance learning instruction? DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 4 2. What do preservice teachers perceive as indicators of emerging positive teacher and student relationships during distance learning? 3. In what ways does distance learning impact the development of positive classroom relationships between the preservice teacher and students? Expected Outcomes Current research on belonging, relationship building, cultural responsiveness, and distance learning in the K-12 setting needs to be examined. This body of research will be used to guide both the research study and the development of the intervention plan that will be implemented. This plan could be implemented in a teacher preparation course to support the ability of preservice teachers to building positive relationships with students. Fiscal Implications The fiscal implications of this study include the revision of course content incorporated into the instructional programming for preservice teachers and access to technology and digital learning tools and applications. The revisions to the instructional programming may include additional professional readings and increased opportunities for field experiences for preservice teachers to observe and implement strategies in a distance learning classroom environment. Summary With the goal of informing the instructional programming to train preservice on relationship-building strategies that can be used to create a supportive distance learning classroom environment, it was necessary to examine existing literature. The next chapter provides a review of the literature focused on the need and importance of positive teacher-student relationships, supporting all students through cultural responsiveness and DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING belonging efforts, and developing positive teacher-student relationships within the distance learning environment. 5 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 6 CHAPTER TWO Literature Review With classrooms becoming increasingly more diverse and with the abrupt transition to distance learning in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever there is an urgent need for preservice teachers to be equipped with the knowledge of effective practices for developing positive teacher-student relationships. The teacher’s ability to establish positive relationships with students can have a long-term effect on both student achievement and teacher satisfaction. The skills needed for building relationships must also extend to the development of relationships between teachers and students who are diverse, representing different ethnicities, cultures, and languages. The need to understand and effectively develop these relationships has become even more urgent with the majority of schools providing instruction in a distance learning setting, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This has resulted in the need for preservice teaching programs to make a concerted effort to lay the foundation of developing teachers who are culturally responsive to students and understand the students’ need for belonging. The aim of this literature review is to look at the inter-connectedness of the teacher and student relationship, with an emphasis on understanding the importance of developing positive relationships with diverse student groups, specifically at the elementary level. The review then focuses on how to support the development of teacherstudent relationships through concepts of belonging and cultural responsiveness in the classroom. This is followed by an analysis of the need for teacher-student relationships within a distance learning environment and strategies for development. The application of DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 7 strategies for building relationships, cultural responsiveness, belonging, and distance learning are highlighted throughout. Belonging Teacher preparation programs must support the preservice teachers’ understanding that academic learning occurs when students feel like they belong and are a part of the classroom community. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1943) equates belonging to the human need for love and must be present with other basic needs in order for a person to lead a happy and satisfying life (Maslow, 1943). When a person has a sense of belonging, there is a mutual feeling of being a part of a group. The person feels that another person, group, or community is not complete without them, and the person feels incomplete without the other person, group, or community (Baskin et al., 2010). Researchers have found that the need for belonging is a significant factor associated with students having positive school-related experiences (Cemalcılar, 2010). The students’ feelings of belonging have a direct impact on other indicators of school success such as the students’ academic motivation (Faircloth & Hamm, 2011), academic aspirations, choices, persistence, and performance (Murphy & Zirkel, 2015), as well as academic, social, and emotional outcomes (Appleton et al., 2006). The relationships between the teacher and students, and among students and their peers, has a significant impact on the students’ sense of belonging in the classroom (Meeuwisse et al., 2010). An effective way to build, maintain and, reinforce student belonging is through the integration of community-building activities within the classroom, with the weight of the responsibility to affect a child’s sense of belonging falling on the teacher. There are a variety of research study topics related to belonging using different terms and definitions such as DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 8 “school connectedness” (Frydenberg et al., 2009; Loukas et al., 2006), “sense of community” (Osterman, 2000), “school climate” (Anderson, 1982), “student engagement” (Corso et al., 2013), and “school bonding” (Catalano et al., 2004). The relationship and support received from the teacher has a direct effect on student engagement beyond the support of parents and peers (Murray & Greenberg, 2000; Wentzel, 1998). Within the context of the school community, Wentzel (1999) proposed that before students can feel a sense of belonging to the larger school community, they must first develop an attachment with the teacher. The interactions between students and their teacher and peers impacts their sense of belonging at school and their social and emotional adjustment, engagement, academic motivation, and learning (Corso et al., 2013; Wentzel, 1999). In addition to having the hierarchical need for belonging being addressed when students have positive and supportive relationships with their teachers and peers, these relationships also encourage students to participate in classroom and school activities (Wentzel, 1999). When teachers focus on building positive relationships with each of their students, the learning environment and culture of the classroom communicates care and belonging (Wentzel, 1999). Belonging occurs when there are mutually beneficial social relationships between the teacher and the student, and between students and their peers (Meloro, 2005). The focus is not limited to one relationship, but instead on multiple lasting and positive interpersonal relationships with peers and other adults at the school (Meloro, 2005). Loreman (2011) tells us that when students have positive relationships, acceptance, and love for every other student in their classroom, the teacher has created a ‘loving pedagogy’ that sets the stage for significant teaching and learning to occur. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Socially connected experiences within the classroom help students to internalize social values, while also helping them to become committed to societal institutions, such as schools (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Therefore, teaching preservice teachers how to facilitate a sense of belonging in the classroom is critical. Opportunities and experiences exist at the university level within the teacher preparation program to reinforce the importance of belonging within the classroom. For example, discussing and reflecting on the meaning of belonging amongst diverse groups, and how to facilitate it in children, observing belonging in actual classrooms, practicing community-building strategies with children, imitating strategies learned from instructors, and dialoguing with experienced teachers and instructors can provide preservice teachers the skills needed to develop feelings of belonging in the classroom. The ability of teacher preparation programs to incorporate these principles of belonging across the program can also support preservice teachers in their understanding of how to engage and teach diverse students effectively and successfully. Interpersonal Teacher-Student Relationships There are a number of factors to consider when preparing preservice teachers for classroom instruction, including the physical layout, the curriculum, the instructional materials, and the mode of instruction. However, with all the factors that contribute to effective instruction, the research identifies the classroom teacher as the most important factor in student learning (Wright et al., 1997). Therefore, in order to provide highquality instruction for all students in a supportive classroom environment, the emphasis for teacher preparation programs must focus on developing and preparing teachers with knowledge regarding their role in establishing positive and supportive teacher-student 9 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 10 relationships. Tosolt (2010) identified highly effective schools for students as schools that offer a supportive environment with teachers that treat all students with respect and care. When teachers demonstrate care toward students by communicating respect and interest, demonstrating warmth and engagement, and responding with sensitivity, the individual relationships with students improve along with the students’ sense of school belonging (Giani & O’Guin, 2010; Ma, 2003). Marzano and Marzano (2003) identify relationships as the building block for effective instruction. The teacher who does not establish these relationships at the beginning of the school year can anticipate encountering negative outcomes with regard to student behavior (Marzano & Marzano, 2003). The social and emotional support the teacher provides for students creates opportunities to cultivate engagement and motivation, which are essential to academic development (Hamre & Pianta, 2005). According to the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network (2002), “emotional support encompasses the classroom warmth, positivity, child centeredness, and the teacher’s sensitivity and responsiveness toward specific children” (p. 371). Several theories also support the idea that strong and meaningful interactions with adults have a positive effect on the development of the students’ emotional and social wellbeing (Hamre & Pianta, 2005). Skinner et al. (1998) found that a positive classroom environment and caring teachers can stimulate self-regulation among students, which leads to increased academic gains. The Need for Positive Teacher-Student Relationships The teacher plays an important role in establishing the classroom climate (Goddard et al., 2004) and children are affected by the classroom relationship with the DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 11 teacher (Goodenow, 1993). In addition to the instructional role of the teacher, the relationship between the teacher and the students is important because it also creates the culture and climate of the classroom and lays the foundation for future academic success. In fact, Trickett and Moos (1973) identified relationships as one of the top three variables that influence classroom culture. Without stable and positive relationships, a child’s lack of secure attachments can manifest in the classroom as a host of behavioral problems that can hinder their academic and social growth (Jensen, 2010). Many of the classroom behaviors labeled and punished as infractions of rules are actually the result of problems with the interpersonal relationship between the teacher and the students and how they relate to one another (Sheets, 1994). According to Hughes et al. (2008), the teacher’s behavior can also have an impact on student behavior. The teacher’s dispositions, coupled with classroom management skills, can result in an increase in academic engagement and achievement and a decrease in problem behaviors (Soodak, 2003; Soodak & McCharty, 2006), enabling the teacher to meet the needs of all students more effectively. Hamre and Pianta (2005) state, “research on the nature and quality of early schooling experiences provides emerging evidence that classroom environments and teacher behaviors are associated in a positive “value-added” sense with student outcomes” (p. 952). It is the teachers who go beyond expectations to create an open and trusting classroom environment, who are able to generate positive student exchanges and enhance student engagement in learning (LaGuardia & Ryan, 2002). These teachers also demonstrate nurturing teacher attributes, as they support the development of positive teacher-student relationships (Martin & Dowson, 2009), resulting in a positive classroom DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 12 environment with improved academic achievement and affective outcomes such as motivation, self-concept, and academic engagement (Fraser &Walberg, 1991). Emotionally supportive interactions have also been associated with a students’ positive growth in reading and math skills (Pianta et al., 2003) as well as social competence (Mashburn, et al., 2008). Supportive teacher relationships, characterized by warmth and open communication (Pianta, 1992), are associated with greater academic performance and engagement (Hughes et al., 2008), and performance (McCartney, 2007). The supportive relationships with the teacher provide a “secure base” (Ainsworth et al., 1978) that allows children to explore and take risks in their learning, and develop social and cognitive skills (Brock, et al., 2008). Therefore, when teachers establish a safe and positive learning environment where students feel supported, student motivation increases, and performance improves (Turner & Patrick, 2004). The teacher also has the ability to shape the students’ thinking skills through positive and purposeful interactions. Cazden (2001) suggests that the teacher-student relationship is one of the most significant factors in the learning environment. The quality of the teacher-student relationships in the classroom is a predictor of the students’ academic engagement (Furrer & Skinner, 2003) and motivation. Teacher-student interactions can awaken a variety of developmental processes (Vygotsky, 1978) for academic achievement. When teachers develop a supportive classroom community, students are imparted with a sense of belonging, their social anxieties and frustrations are alleviated, and students are more motivated to comply with the teacher’s requests and act appropriately with their peers (Elias & Schwab, 2006). Theories of motivation suggest DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 13 that students are more likely to engage in learning when teachers are thoughtful, approachable, and sensitive (Hamre & Pianta, 2005). Having a caring relationship with an adult is also a protective factor associated with resilience and the development of prosocial competencies that promote learning (Masten, 1994). As a result, a positive teacher-student relationship has a high correlation to student achievement (Niebuhr & Niebuhr, 1999) and plays a critical role in the development of school readiness skills (Pianta et al., 2008), which students need throughout their school career. Additional research findings also support the premise that social and emotional support from teachers may be equally impactful to the academic development of students, as is the use of specific instructional techniques (Hamre & Pianta, 2005). The Teacher-Student Relationship Influence on Elementary Students Establishing positive teacher-student relationships is especially important for beginning learners. Several studies suggest that, at school entry, the quality of the relationship students establish with the kindergarten teacher, and the kindergarten teacher’s capacity to create an emotionally supportive classroom community, are the two major determinants of the students’ classroom success and their subsequent school adjustment (Downer et al., 2008). Researchers have also found a link between the closeness of the student-teacher relationship in kindergarten and school adjustment, learning engagement (Hamre & Pianta, 2001), and emotion regulation skills (O’Connor et al., 2011). When children experience feelings of support from their teacher, they are more likely to perceive themselves as competent and motivated, which increases their learning efforts and performance (Osterman, 2000; Wentzel, 2002). Children in classrooms with a high level of emotional support, are also more likely to demonstrate DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 14 attentive, on-task, and engaged learning behaviors when compared to children in less emotionally supportive classrooms (Pianta et al., 2002). The results of longitudinal studies suggest sustained benefits for children who experience close relationships with their kindergarten teachers, including an increase in prosocial engagement and lower rates of aggressive behaviors in first grade (Pianta & Stuhlman, 2004), and improved learning engagement that extends through fourth grade (Hamre & Pianta, 2001). For these reasons, it’s important for teachers to model the behaviors that cultivate a positive classroom environment, and remember that students look to them for the social cues for behavior (Tomey-Purta et al., 2001). When children have positive teacher-student relationships at a young age, they learn the skills, attitudes, and beliefs necessary for academic achievement. Therefore, the emphasis on developing a positive teacher-student relationship should start at the elementary level, as soon as students begin school. The Teacher-Student Relationship Influence on Diverse Student Groups Gaining attention, is the importance of establishing caring teacher-student relationships and instructional approaches for relationship-building for students deemed to be at risk (Baker et al., 1997; Noddings, 1992; Pianta & Walsh, 1996). The need for positive teacher-student relationships is also important when teachers engage with diverse student groups. We know that the students’ perceptions of interpersonal connectedness to teachers at school and "belonging" to the school culture have an impact on their academic engagement and psychological well-being (Goodenow & Grady, 1992; Wentzel, 1994). The quality of the student-teacher relationship and the emotional support within the classroom are particularly important for socio-economically disadvantaged children (Hughes et al., 2008; Pianta et al., 2002; Silver, Measelle et al., DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 15 2005), due to the emotional and social instability they may be experiencing in the community or home environment. That is why the key goal of early childhood programs for low-income families, such as Head Start, is to offer high-quality support and enrichment as a counter-response to the effects associated with poverty (Administration for Children and Families, 2010). In addition to academic problems and school failure, students who are at-risk have reported feelings of alienation and a disconnection from the school culture (Fine, 1986). According to Mau (1992), the perspective of being alienated or disconnected is caused by the student’s feelings of powerlessness, meaninglessness, normlessness, and social estrangement. Powerlessness occurs when there is a lack of control or ability to change a situation. Students may experience meaninglessness towards the content if it does not reflect their lived experience. This occurs when schools present Whiteness as the normative culture for standards of behavior, language, and the curriculum. Students who resist the cultural norms or expectations within the school develop feelings of normlessness. Students may also experience social estrangement when they are separated from their peers for academic remediation, language instruction, or for their behavior. Over time this social estrangement can lead to an emotional or physical disconnection from the school environment. Therefore, it is important for teachers to demonstrate an interest in students as individuals. Empirical studies regarding the teacher-student relationship have reflected on how teacher behaviors such as paying attention, listening, and responding to students, and treating students as individuals, are reflected back from the students as engagement and motivation to learn (Larson, 2006; Schussler & Collins, 2006). DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 16 In relation to the increasing achievement gap between students from different socioeconomic or ethnic backgrounds, educational researchers have examined contextual factors that affect student performance, achievement, and social behaviors (Booker, 2004; Eisele & Thomson, 2009). One factor for minority students, who may have a heightened sensitivity to impersonal school relationships due to a negative experience with a teacher from the majority group, is school belonging. When educators or students represent different ethnic or socioeconomic groups, establishing positive teacher-student relationships can communicate to students that they are valuable, capable, and worthy of being heard (Giani & O’Guin, 2010; Hughes & Kwok, 2007). Research also points to increased achievement for at-risk students when high expectations are coupled with a supportive classroom environment (Bernard, 1991; Stockard & Mayberry, 1992; Wang et al., 1994). When teachers demonstrate an awareness of their students’ culture and home lives, the students feel more connected to the teacher (Curwin et al., 2018). For many of these students, the connection between the culture of the home and the culture of the school can be further developed through positive relationships between the teacher and students (Wang et al., 1994). This occurs when teachers take the time to get to know the students, their families, their home and community experiences, and their culture. This helps to communicate a genuine interest in the students and serves as a building block for relationship-building between the teacher and student. Once the relationship is established, it also creates a pathway where the teacher can address the instructional and emotional needs of the students and close the achievement gap between DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 17 students who thrive in school and those who struggle both academically and behaviorally (Hamre & Pianta, 2005). Baker (1999) examined teacher-student interactions and relationships among poor, urban, African-American students expressing high and low satisfaction with school (p.65). This study found that at-risk students felt alienated from school in addition to their struggles with academic achievement. For these students, the social context of the classroom had an impact on how they described their school experience with regard to being a likable and satisfying environment. Baker (1999) found that the students who liked school and those who disliked school had experienced different social interactions and connectedness at the school. Students who cited more support from teachers had highly satisfying school experiences as compared to the students who expressed less support from their teachers (Baker, 1999). In this study, a caring, psychologically safe classroom environment was a predictor of the student’s satisfaction within the school. The majority of the students expressed an “expanded role” by the teacher (Noddings, 1992), such as sharing emotional support and talking with them about personal problems, as the means by which their teachers “cared” for them (Baker, 1999), which fostered a sense of belonging and acceptance. However, impoverished relationships between teachers and students were most common in schools where students lacked personal support from teachers and spent less time interacting with them (Waxman et al., 1997), which further demonstrates the need for enhanced teacher-student relationships in urban schools with at-risk students. The need to train teachers to effectively nurture and support positive relationships with students should begin during the teacher preparation program. However, these DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 18 programs may be physically isolated from communities with at-risk students. This isolation can lead to a lack of exposure, experience, and connectedness with the communities where these students are located. Without preservice teachers having experiences with at-risk students during their teacher preparation program, there could be an even greater disconnectedness between the students and the preservice teachers. Therefore, in addition to developing content knowledge, teacher preparation programs should support the preservice teachers’ understanding of race, culture, poverty. Many teacher education programs focus almost exclusively on technical skill-building for lesson planning, instructional methods, and behavioral management (Bartolomé, 2002; Gorski, 2012; Rodríguez, 2013). In doing so, they fail to adequately address significant gaps between the skills, knowledge, and experiences that White and middle-class teachers need during the teacher preparation program in order to learn how to effectively relate to and teach diverse student populations and to develop positive relationships with diverse and low-income students. Research also shows that most new teachers in diverse school settings, do not live in the communities in which they teach; this impacts their ability to be viewed as role models because their engagement and exposure to the local community may be limited to the scheduled school day (Zeichner & Gore, 1990). Whereas in a less diverse school setting, the white, middle-class teacher is able to start teaching in a school with familiar culture and leads instruction with students with familiar culture and experiences very few cultural conflicts (Cochran-Smith, 1997). Implications for Preservice Teachers For preservice teachers who plan to work with diverse student populations, there is an added responsibility of understanding the culture of the students, as they work to DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 19 develop positive relationships. Therefore, the responsibility for preparing preservice teachers to develop positive teacher-student relationships must start during the teacher preparation program. Teacher preparation programs tend to emphasize competencies related to effective instructional methodology including lesson planning, the delivery of instruction, assessment measures, and remediation. However, an additional competency for relationship-building is also necessary. Limited research attention has been given to the development of caring relationships in the context of teaching and learning. Accordingly, preservice teachers tend to view caring as a personal trait and natural instinct without an understanding of the teacher’s obligation and responsibility for developing caring relationships with students (Goldstein & Lake, 2000; McLaughlin, 1991). Goldstein and Freedman (2003) suggest that the preservice teachers’ understanding of teacher caring is highly correlated to their relationships with the teacher educators in their preparation program and their mentor teacher. Given that, preservice teachers may project the relationships they build with their teacher educators and mentor teachers on to their relationships with their own students. Examining the development of teacher-students relationships during the preparation training may indicate how preservice teachers will demonstrate caring in their future classroom. Ideally, the emphasis on developing positive teacher-student relationships should be infused into coursework, field placements, and supervisory experiences. According to Milner (2006), many teacher preparation courses lack adequate opportunities for preservice teachers to engage in meaningful conversations about race, culture, and socioeconomic status. These conversations enable preservice teachers to reflect on their own beliefs about different cultural frameworks and their own DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 20 socialization with other groups (Bryant et al., 2015). Their beliefs impact their role as a teacher in how they respond to student language, tone, gestures, and demeanor. For these reasons, teacher education programs are also charged with supporting preservice teachers in developing the competencies needed to effectively teach low-income and at-risk children, which can be a difficult task (Brown et al., 2012; Gorski, 2012; Paulson & Marchant, 2012; Raible & Irizarry, 2010). This is most evident when examining the role of culture in teaching, with regard to establishing connections between the students and teacher. One way to increase the academic performance of students who are racially, culturally, and economically diverse is to provide preservice teachers with training to develop the knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions that are needed to teach in a diverse school setting (Milner, 2006). When teachers are familiar or experienced in recognizing the lived realities of their students, they are able to develop a learning environment that is grounded in meaning and significance for students. Limited teacher interactions, missed communications, and misunderstandings due to limited cultural synchronization or interpersonal context, can cause negative teaching experiences for preservice teachers (Irvine, 1992). Hilliard (1995), Kunjufu (2002), Delpit (2006), Nieto (1999), LadsonBillings (1994), Tatum (2007), and many other educators support the notion that teachers need to have a strong understanding of culture when teaching, especially when teaching diverse learners. This is critically important for the success of the teacher in reaching and engaging all students. When the teachers take the time to learn about the students’ family, home life, culture, language, and values, they are better equipped to support students in the classroom and gain support from the family. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 21 According to Ladson-Billings (1994), “it is respectful for teachers to acknowledge students’ experiences outside the classroom and use these experiences to promote relationships with students and their families. Effective teaching involves in-depth knowledge of both the students and the subject matter” (p. 125). By doing so, the teacher is able to form a stronger connection with the student and positively affect their academic growth and overall well-being in the classroom. However, the relationship between the teacher and students will be limited if teachers are not talking to students and inquiring about their life outside of school. If the teacher does not recognize the students’ skills outside the classroom, they are more likely to have difficulty engaging and motivating the students in classroom learning (Delpit, 2006). When teachers aren’t able to see the strengths of students who are culturally different, they inadvertently teach down to them (Delpit, 2006, p. 173). “When teachers do not understand the potential of the students they teach, they will under teach them, no matter what the methodology” (p. 175). This can result in students not being taught curricular content in depth and student boredom and lack of interest in school. Therefore, preservice teachers need to view their work within the cultural context of their students and understand the integral relationship between culture and social behavior (DuncanAndrade, 2005). Cultural Responsiveness Culturally responsive teachers should possess the knowledge and skills necessary to create inclusive classroom environments that supports the full engagement and participation of all learners. Without culturally responsive teachers, children of diversity DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 22 may experience difficulty due to language barriers, educational gaps, and low teacher expectations (Avery & Walker, 1993). However, when teachers are aware of the experiences of their students and their culture, the teacher can take steps to actively improve the quality of teacher-student relationships and the learning process for their diverse students. By incorporating culturally responsive instructional strategies the participation of diverse students increases, their performance and achievement improves (Byrd, 2016), and they experience academic success (Williams, 1971). Phuntsog (1999) asserts that when a culturally responsive pedagogical approach is implemented, a safe classroom environment with respect for all learners is established. Barriers to teacher success in urban schools have been correlated to teachers who lack cultural competencies, display low expectations and lack of caring for students, and racial/ethnic, linguistic, and class biases (Bollin, 2007; Brown & Rodríguez, 2009; Howard & Milner, 2014; Rodríguez, 2012; Williams, 2013). When teachers acquire knowledge about cultural differences and diversity, and they take steps to make their instruction more culturally responsive, they are able to address cultural diversity in the classroom (Ladson-Billings, 1994). Teachers who are culturally responsive also have a much better understanding of teaching (Ladson-Billings, 1994). The efficiency of the learning-teaching process is dependent on the knowledge, skill, and proficiency levels of the teacher. According to Gay (2002), there are specific culturally responsive competencies that should be expected of teachers including, being aware of their cultural identity and prejudices, the ability and willingness to learn the world views of groups that are different from their own culture, and the development of culturally responsive DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 23 teaching methods. Therefore, within the broad expectation of ‘education for all,’ education should be presented in an inclusive manner that emphasizes the cultural differences of students (Karatas & Oral, 2016). When middle-class White teachers are placed in urban schools with students who are predominantly of color, significant cultural and language differences between the students and the teacher often result in feelings of uneasiness by the teacher (Cushner et al., 1996). Cultural and ethnic differences can impact a variety of factors including the interactions between the student and the teacher, the behavioral expectations, the way content is presented, the emphasis on the importance of the content, classroom climate, and the willingness of the students to engage with the content. The literature suggests that the combination of diverse students in Eurocentric schools, results in a conflict of cultures (Ladson-Billings, 1995), due to the different cultural norms between the teacher and the students for standards of behavior, language, and interactions. Therefore, in order for middle-class White teachers to be effective in culturally diverse educational settings, they must be culturally responsive and possess the cultural intelligence and instructional flexibility necessary to adapt and effectively instruct diverse students. Models of Cultural Responsiveness Three facets of cultural intelligence were introduced by Earley and Ang (2003). Their framework consists of three factors, cognition, motivation, and behavior. The model was later extended by Ang and Dyne (2008) to incorporate four factors that, when used together, lead to effectiveness in ones’ ability to adapt to different cultures. These factors include metacognition, cognition, motivation, behavior, and customs, enabling us to understand a given situation. In order to begin the process of understanding and DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 24 bridging these differences, researchers believe that teachers should be engaged in critical conversations about their own cultural identities and the cultural identities and perceptions of the racially diverse students that they teach (Haberman, 2004). The ability of middle-class majority culture teachers to appreciate and understand the cultural capital of minority cultures within the urban school setting could increase the success rate of minority students in school. Students in diverse communities possess different learning styles and preferences that stem from various experiences influenced by their cultural backgrounds. These learning styles may be in disharmony with the dominant values and beliefs of the classroom teacher, which is reflected in the teacher’s pedagogical approach to instruction in the classroom (Berry, 2001; Ladson-Billings, 1995; Nieto, 2000). The social structures, practices, and beliefs that reinforce racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic privilege lead to stratification and isolation, causing knowledge deficits for teachers and creating barriers in the development of valuable cultural, social, and linguistic capital in the classroom (Orfield & Lee, 2005; Ryabov & Van Hook, 2007). These gaps in knowledge and experience may inhibit many white and middle-class preservice teachers from engaging in critical examinations of schooling to address the needs of low-income children of color. As a result, white preservice teachers may lack the critical cultural knowledge needed to connect personally with students of diverse backgrounds. In order for White preservice elementary school teachers to have an awareness and understanding of the impact of cultural differences on achievement, teacher preparation programs must provide them with experiences to develop their knowledge, skills, and positive attitude towards culturally responsive pedagogy. When integrating DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 25 culturally responsive teaching into the instruction, the classroom teacher’s focus should be on building trust, having cultural literacy, knowing a variety of teaching methods and techniques, using effective inquiry techniques, providing effective feedback, analyzing teaching materials, and establishing a positive home-school relationship (Jackson, 1994). Preservice teachers should be trained to consider the cultural background and experiences of their students when engaging in the planning process. This can be accomplished by having preservice teachers design learning experiences that explore issues related to social, cultural, linguistic, and religious diversity (Darling-Hammond et al., 2002). Brown (2007) emphasizes that teachers should identify classroom practices that align the cultural background and experiences of their students to a framework of respect for pluralistic understandings and differences. This can be accomplished by learning about the cultural background of the students, being aware of stereotypes and prejudices, understanding the social, emotional, and political status of students, and developing classroom management skills that are culturally responsive (Jackson, 1994). Teacher-Student Relationships and Distance Learning With the COVID-19 pandemic, schools have had to transition to online distance learning with limited teacher preparation and training. When learning remotely, the dynamic relationship between the teacher and students becomes even more important. For distance learning, social presence and acceptance are significant factors for consideration (Mclsaac & Blocher, 1998) and should be a component of the distance learning design process. The psychological distance between the student and the teacher may cause feelings of isolation for the student, which could hinder the rapport and relationship development (Wolcott, 1996). Wolcott (1996) states that it is this rapport that DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 26 enables the teacher-student relationship to develop and the learning discourse to occur. Distance learning is less effective if it lacks consideration for the human dimension (Spitzer, 1998). Spitzer (1998) states that the social interactions between the teacher and students determine the success or failure of the distance learning program. Moore (1996) describes purposeful instructional dialog as a necessity when facilitating interactions between the teacher and students. In a purposeful dialog environment, students are active participants who communicate by listening and building on the contributions of other learners. Therefore, collaborative learning opportunities should be intentionally applied to enhance the distance learning environment. According to Saba and Shearer (1994), as dialog and learner control increase, transactional distance decreases. Traditional classroom management strategies typically utilized for face-to-face instruction can be effectively incorporated into the distance learning environment to support virtual relationship-building with students. When online instructors build relationships in a distance learning environment, student engagement, satisfaction, and retention increase (Marzano & Marzano, 2003), while the instructor is also enhancing the efficiency of their online instructional practices. While quality teaching in traditional classrooms can translate to quality online teaching (Garrison & Anderson, 2003; Journell et al., 2013), there are additional competencies that are needed in order to meet the learning needs of the students when instruction is provided in a setting where the teacher and learners are separated by time and distance (Learn NC, 2008; National Education Association, 2006; Palloff & Pratt, 2011; Redmond, 2011). Courses instructing teachers on how to conduct online instruction are seldom offered during teacher preparation programs, and as a result, many new DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 27 teachers are entering the field without having experience as online learners or knowledge of how to provide online instruction (Barbour et al., 2013; Kennedy & Archambault, 2012; Kennedy et al., 2013). In this regard, teacher preparation programs are failing to adequately prepare educators for online instruction (Barbour et al., 2013; Journell et al., 2013; NEA, 2006), and tens of thousands of “new teachers who enter the profession each year begin without online teaching skills in their professional repertoire” (NEA, 2006 p. 3). Teacher preparation programs should consider providing some component of online learning for preservice teachers. Online learning programs can be successful when they prepare teachers by providing opportunities to develop a community of learners through professional development and offer ongoing support and monitoring to ensure that teachers meet high expectations (Roblyer, 2006) for student engagement and instruction. Teachers and students may feel that being physically disconnected and lacking a visual reference with their students creates a barrier to cultivating relationships. Mayes et al. (2011) argued that the separation in time and place make interactions between teachers and students critically important in an online environment. When the teacher and the students are physically separated, the psychological distance can have a negative consequence on communication and learning. In-person conversation and instruction help to convey messages both verbally and non-verbally. The teacher’s facial expressions, gestures, and tone help to add context and meaning to what is being said to children. Within a distance learning environment, some of these non-verbal behavior cues to communicate meaning are no longer available to our students. We know that without these non-verbal cues, creating a sense of community online can be more challenging (Ke & Hoadley, 2009). When students have limited opportunities to interact with the teacher DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 28 and their peers online, feelings of isolation may have a negative effect on the student’s sense of community (Koslow & Pina, 2015). With the knowledge of the academic and social benefits provided to students during in-person instructioon, teachers must work to create a sense of community during distance learning (Lai, 2015; Lovitts, 2001; Rovai, 2003). In order to be effective, distance learning instructors must proactively address the sense of isolation that often occurs in an online learning environment by being intentional about promoting a positive and interactive social presence (Mayes et al., 2011) for students. The International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL) Standards for Quality Online Teaching states that effective online instructors build community among course participants within a student-centered environment (iNACOL, 2011), which is outlined using a Community of Inquiry Framework. The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison et al., 2010) provides a useful explanation as to how a community can be established within online classrooms. There are three interdependent components of community building through the CoI framework: social presence, teaching presence, and cognitive presence. Social presence is the ability of participants to establish themselves as real in a virtual environment (Garrison et al., 2010). Teachers can assist students in cultivating their social presence by encouraging them to have an authentic presence in the virtual classroom. This is accomplished when teachers allow students to share elements of their life with the teacher and their peers (Garrison, 2011). Cognitive presence refers to the teacher’s ability to facilitate instructional experiences that are reflexive and provoke dialogue, by creating a learning environment where students can question, critique, and reflect with their peers (Garrison et al., 2010). Classrooms with a DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 29 strong cognitive presence enable students to attain shared academic goals by working in a collaborative environment. Teachers who integrate the Community of Inquiry framework within their instruction integrate the teaching presence, social presence, and cognitive presence within their online classrooms, which helps to facilitate a sense of trust, belonging, and self-disclosure for the students (Garrison et al., 2010). Over time, these feelings create a learning community in the distance learning classrooms (Garrison et al., 2010). Unfortunately, many teachers who provide online instruction report receiving little to no support or instruction on how to design a distance learning classroom environment (Hawkins et al., 2012). The literature on K-12 online learning indicates the majority of the investigations were related to interactions between the learner and the instructor, such as active learning strategies and providing feedback to students (Cavanaugh et al., 2009). Teachers also need to be taught how to develop and support positive interactions with and between students while engaging in distance learning. As the primary point of contact for students within a distance learning program, the teacher plays an important role in cultivating a sense of community with the class (Garrison, 2011). The teacher should utilize the curriculum and all instructional opportunities to facilitate peer interactions by incorporating instructional activities that require collaboration, interaction, and reflection (Garrison et al., 2010). In addition, the teacher’s facilitation skills and style should also support the creation of the classroom community (Demmans et al., 2017). In fact, Phirangee et al. (2016) found that when teachers actively facilitated online discussions, students felt more connected with the class. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 30 A community can also be built through the coursework (Garrison, 2011), such as assignments that require students to share knowledge with their peers (Waycott et al., 2013). Barak and Rafeli (2004) found that blogs, wikis, and discussion/message boards increased collaboration and peer support in online classes. Teaching activities that encouraged deep reflection (Shea et al., 2006) and small group discussions where students could think critically and share meaningful insights increased student engagement in the learning community (Martin & Bolliger, 2018). By creating these kinds of opportunities for students to learn with and from one another, instructors can cultivate a strong teaching presence that supports the development of the students’ social and cognitive presence (Garrison, 2011) in the distance learning environment. The structure of the distance learning environment is an equally important factor to consider. The selection of instructional strategies such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation to support the facilitation of learner interactions is critical for student success (Weston & Cranton, 1986). However, programs that do not allow teachers the opportunity to integrate the students’ contributions, interactions, and discussions, will have a detrimental effect on the overall learning outcomes desired (Moore, 1996; Parker, 1999). A variety of learner-instructor, learner-learner, and learner-content interactions should be integrated into the instruction (Moore, 1992; Wagner, 1997). In addition, learner-to-interface interactions should also be utilized within the distance learning program (Hillman et al., 1994). The numerous forms of social interactions possible within the distance learning environment should be considered as a part of the instructional design process for the class. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 31 When considering all of these factors, the teacher has to determine where to start when designing instruction. Context plays a critical role in the instructional design and should be addressed when identifying the specific types of interactions and methodologies (Tessmer & Richey, 1997) to incorporate. Wagner (1997) recommends that the teacher should start by determining the desired instructional outcomes, analyzing the type of learning that is desired (verbal or intellectual skills, psychomotor skills, or attitude changes), and then select the type of interaction that will facilitate the desired learning. For example, dynamic role-playing, debate, detailed case studies, authentic problem-solving, panel discussions, group presentations, peer teaching, and creative individual and group projects all provide opportunities for the different types of interactions possible (Wagner, 1997). Distance Learning Strategies for Preservice Teachers Although K-12 distance learning has grown exponentially, currently the research is limited in regard to best practices for K-12 distance learning and preparation training for teachers (Barbour, 2016; Ferdig et al., 2009). This absence of research specific to K12 distance learning has created a gap in the training for effective pedagogy for preservice teachers (Barbour, 2016; Ferdig et al., 2009). With the shift to distance learning, there is an urgent need for additional research into effective practices for online instruction in K-12 settings. Despite limited research in this area, we do know that the effectiveness of K-12 distance education has less to do with the medium, technology, and resources used, and more to do with the teacher, the students, and the teaching and learning strategies implemented (Bernard et al., 2004; Journell et al., 2013; Rice, 2006). DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 32 Teachers need to be able to identify effective practices for engaging students and building productive teacher-student relationships within a digital learning environment. Like in-person instruction, a strong teacher presence is essential, along with instructional activities that build upon the strengths of students, invite participation, and present content in various modalities as frequently as possible (Wilson, 2014). Many of the instructional strategies utilized in a traditional in-person classroom can also be adapted for a distance learning model to increase student engagement and build relationships with students. While there are differences between in-person and distance learning, many of the strategies for relationship-building are interchangeable between both approaches to instruction. Underdown and Martin (2016), studied how meaningful relationships can be developed through a computer screen rather than through in-person instruction. They found that online instructors must work to establish these same relationships when there is a virtual gap separating the teacher and student. The distance learning model also offers many advantages over in-person instruction due to the access and use of technology. Technology can be used to build teacher-student and peer relationships and engage students quickly and effectively. In addition, there are numerous technology tools available to help teachers with bridging the virtual gap and connecting with students. Screen recorders, such as Screencast-O-Matic (screencast-o-matic.com) and videoconferencing software such as Loom (www.useloom.com) and Zoom (www. zoom.us) are tools used to facilitate important personal connections. In order to maintain wellness and meaningful learning, students need to be able to connect with others and the world around them. When we build networks of diverse DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 33 connections, learning occurs (Siemens, 2005) through social contexts (Vygotsky, 1978), and students feel a part of a community and have opportunities to share (Hittie, 2000). When these opportunities are provided to them in a simple, yet engaging way online, the students are able to continue to build important relationships virtually. Synchronous virtual classrooms that include technical features such as chat rooms, text communication, and breakout rooms for small group discussion, help students and teachers make connections in the distance learning classroom (McDaniels et al., 2016). Leblanc and Lindgren (2013) also found that courses with synchronous video helped students to communicate easily. Building meaningful relationships with students in a distance learning environment may be a challenge for many teachers, but these relationships lead to increased engagement and improved overall satisfaction of the students (Martin, 2017). One strategy for building relationships with students is showing an interest in their life (Martin, 2017; Marzano & Marzano, 2003). Teachers can show an interest in students by asking questions and providing opportunities for students to share within the distance learning environment. Asking questions of the students is an effective strategy to quickly build relationships and community (Ahmad et al., 2017). Asking students noninvasive questions and providing time for students to share their interests is a simple and effective way to quickly establish a collaborative tone for any classroom (Ahmad et al., 2017). In fact, it is natural for students to have the desire to share about themselves and feel they are a part of a community (Hittie, 2000). That is why asking questions is a simple, yet effective, way to have students build relationships in a distance learning environment. Synchronous video calls such as Zoom and Google Classroom are also effective tools for DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 34 providing online instruction where students can engage with the teacher, other students, and the content in real-time. Through these tools, the instructor is continually building stronger relationships with students, and the students can experience connectedness and engagement within the distance learning community. One option for teacher preparation programs is the formation of electronic learning communities (eLCs) to provide preservice teachers with a common language for communicating about teaching and learning (Chen et al., 2009). An eLC is an online community where teachers are members of a committed and involved professional group, over an extended period of time, with opportunities for synchronous and asynchronous communication (Duncan-Howell, 2010). This type of support network for online teachers is a key to providing sustained professional learning that can positively impact the quality of instructional support and increase student learning in both the traditional and virtual settings (Vescio et al., 2008). According to a study of online learning communities for teachers, these communities enable participants to learn from their peers, stay up-to-date with current trends, engage in discussions, share professional knowledge, obtain support from colleagues, and build a network of like-minded educators (Duncan-Howell, 2010). Teachers who participate in this type of learning community are provided with authentic opportunities for interaction and community-building, which are research-based practices for effective online teaching (Cavanaugh et al., 2009; Hawkins et al., 2013). This community of practice framework can function as an apprenticeship model for preservice teachers as they are learning new skills by providing both a structure and process for developing and maintaining an online learning community. In this type of learning DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 35 environment, they can work with practicing teachers and engage with field-specific experts through a network of support. Ultimately, in order for distance education to be effective, the design efforts must consider the barriers to effective learning such as transactional, psychological, and sociological distance (Moore, 1996; Wolcott, 1996). The student’s skills and learning experience can be enhanced by designing and facilitating distance learning programs that encourage both discussions and interactions between the teacher and students, and between groups of students (Wagner, 1997). Within the distance learning environment, a variety of methodologies can be utilized to facilitate effective interactions, such as roleplaying, panel discussions, case studies, and authentic collaborative problem-solving (Cyrs & Conway, 2000). Summary This literature review explored the need for positive teacher-student relationships at the elementary level and the ability of teachers to establish these relationships with a diverse student population (considering the students’ culture, socio-economic level, and language), and in a distance learning environment. The literature indicates the correlation of positive outcomes to school connectedness, engagement, motivation, resiliency, and increased student achievement. Positive teacher-student relationships are the building block for effective instruction (Marzano & Marzano, 2003). The teacher-student relationship creates the culture and climate of the classroom, lays the foundation for future academic success, and the development of the students’ emotional and social wellbeing (Hamre & Pianta, 2005). The students’ perceptions of interpersonal connectedness to teachers at school and DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 36 "belonging" to the school culture can also have an impact on their academic engagement and psychological well-being (Goodenow & Grady, 1992; Wentzel, 1994). Establishing positive relationships between the teacher and students who represent different ethnic or socioeconomic groups, communicates to students that they are valuable, capable, and worthy of being heard (Giani & O’Guin, 2010; Hughes & Kwok, 2007). When learning remotely, the dynamic relationship between the teacher and students becomes even more important. While building meaningful relationships with students in a distance learning environment may be a challenge for many teachers, these relationships have been shown to increase engagement and improve the overall satisfaction of the students (Martin, 2017). Therefore, the emphasis for teacher preparation programs must focus on developing and preparing teachers with the knowledge of their role in establishing the teacherstudent relationship within the classroom environment. Teacher preparation programs must also support the preservice teachers’ understanding that academic learning occurs when students feel like they belong and are a part of the classroom community. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 37 CHAPTER THREE Methodology The literature review focused on the importance of developing positive teacherstudent relationships in a distance learning environment and identified how a supportive classroom environment facilitates active student engagement and participation, which are critical factors for the academic, social, and emotional development of students. The relationship and support from the teacher also have a direct impact on student engagement (Murray & Greenberg, 2000; Wentzel, 1998). According to Wolcott (1996), it is the positive rapport between the teacher and students that enables the teacher-student relationship to develop and the learning discourse to occur. Therefore, for student success, it is important to both create and sustain a positive and supportive classroom environment. The literature review also explored teacher dispositions when providing distance learning instruction to elementary students in a diverse school setting, as well as strategies for creating a positive rapport and a sense of belonging with students. The relationships between teachers and students and among students and their peers foster the students’ sense of belonging in the classroom (Meeuwisse et al., 2010). The student’s sense of belonging has an impact on indicators of school success such as the student academic motivation (Faircloth & Hamm, 2011), academic aspirations, persistence, and performance (Murphy & Zirkel, 2015), as well as the academic, social, and emotional outcomes (Appleton et al., 2006). These studies also highlighted how student engagement, satisfaction, and retention increase when teachers build positive relationships with their students during distance learning (Marzano & Marzano, 2003). DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 38 Several studies identified the lack of support and development of teachers as they engage with students during distance learning. Consequently, many teachers who provide online instruction have received little to no training on how to design a supportive distance learning classroom environment (Hawkins et al., 2012). In addition, specific courses on how to conduct online instruction are seldom offered during teacher preparation programs. This has resulted in many novice teachers having limited experience as online learners and lacking the knowledge and experience of how to plan and deliver online instruction (Barbour et al., 2013; Kennedy & Archambault, 2012; Kennedy et al., 2013). Although K-12 distance learning has grown exponentially during the past few years, there is limited research on the best practices for training and preparing preservice teachers (Barbour, 2016; Ferdig et al., 2009) to establish relationships and lead instruction in a distance learning environment. In addition to these concerns, the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the urgency for research on how to develop and support the preservice teachers’ ability to implement effective practices and to create a supportive distance learning classroom setting. The student teaching practicum within the teacher preparation program plays a critical role in preparing preservice teachers with the knowledge and skills needed to create a supportive classroom culture, communicate care, and emphasize positive feelings of belonging within the classroom. Creating learning communities for teachers enables them to learn from their peers, stay up-to-date with current trends, engage in discussions, share professional knowledge, obtain support from colleagues, and build a network of like-minded educators (Duncan-Howell, 2010). DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 39 In order to create meaningful relationships with students, preservice teachers need to self-reflect on relationship-building strategies by identifying if the effectiveness of the strategies. During this study, the preservice teachers reflected on their knowledge of relationship-building strategies during pre-intervention interviews. Then the intervention was applied in which the preservice teachers participated in a small learning community where they learned specific relationship-building strategies through a book study using the book, Engaging Students with Poverty in Mind: Practical Strategies for Raising Achievement. This book focused on how to build positive teacher and student relationships with low socioeconomic minority students in an urban school environment. After the intervention, the preservice teachers reflected on the relationship-building strategies they implemented with students during post-intervention interviews. This action research study implemented a mixed-methods approach using interviews, observations, and journal reflections for data collection. The participants in this action research study were preservice teachers assigned to work with elementary students in an urban school setting during their student teaching placement. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, instruction during the student teaching practicum was delivered within an online distance learning classroom setting. In response to the literature, the researcher set out to determine if the preservice teachers’ disposition and ability to create supportive relationships within the distance learning environment, developed after engaging in ongoing professional development. Purpose The purpose of this research study was to gain insight into the perceptions and the degree to which preservice teachers implement relationship-building strategies to foster 40 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING positive teacher-student relationships while providing instruction through a distance learning platform. This study also sought to identify deficit areas that teacher preparation programs could address to prepare preservice teachers to establish positive teacherstudent relationships within the distance learning classroom environment. As a result, the following research questions were identified: 1. How do preservice teachers perceive the importance of relationshipbuilding strategies when delivering distance learning instruction? 2. What do preservice teachers perceive as indicators of emerging positive teacher-student relationships during distance learning? 3. In what ways does distance learning impact the development of positive classroom relationships between the preservice teacher and students? Setting and Participants This action research study was conducted through the elementary and early childhood program at a campus in northeastern Pennsylvania, which is part of a larger university with multiple campuses in Pennsylvania. This campus is relatively small and located in a suburban community. The program places preservice teachers in the neighboring urban K-12 school district for the student teaching practicum during the fall and spring semesters of the senior year. During the fall semester, the preservice teachers are placed in an elementary classroom for the full day on Tuesdays and Thursdays. During the spring semester, the preservice teachers engage in full-time classroom instruction in an elementary classroom, Monday through Friday. The preservice teachers are supervised by University staff and experienced teachers who serve as their mentors. The preservice teachers also attend a seminar on campus once a week for two and a half DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 41 hours after the school day. During the time of this study, there were fifteen preservice teachers enrolled in the teacher preparation program. Within the elementary and early childhood program practicum experience, the preservice teachers are placed in an elementary classroom in the neighboring urban school district. The neighboring district is a large, urban school district serving the city of Reading and located between Harrisburg and Philadelphia in southeastern Pennsylvania. The District has nineteen schools, including thirteen elementary schools, five middle schools, and one senior high school. With more than 17,800 students and approximately 2,000 staff members, the school district is the fourth-largest school district in Pennsylvania. The district is also a Title 1 school district located in a high-poverty community. According to the school district’s website (2020), the students represent 28 countries and speak 27 different languages. The student population is 80.7% Latino, 9.3% Black, 6.9% White, 2.5% Multiracial, and 0.5% Asian. Approximately 93.3% of the students are economically disadvantaged and qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, approximately 25% are English Language Learners, and approximately 18% are Special Education Learners (2020). During the final two semesters of the elementary and early childhood education teacher preparation program, the preservice teachers are placed in an elementary classroom in the school district for a total of twenty-eight weeks. During the fall semester, the preservice teachers participate in the first half of the practicum experience. This experience lasts for fourteen weeks. Over the course of the fall semester, the preservice teachers spend two full weeks in the school. One week during the beginning of the semester and one week during the middle of the semester to observe how their mentor DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 42 teacher creates and maintains the classroom community and expectations. For the remaining twelve weeks of the semester, the students are at the placement school for two full days per week. During the spring semester, the preservice teachers return to the same classroom for the full-time component of the student teaching practicum for an additional fourteen weeks. During this study, the preservice teachers in the cohort were placed in one of three elementary schools within the school district and were randomly assigned to a grade level, mentor teacher, and university supervisor for the fall and spring semesters for the student teaching practicum. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the school district provided distance learning instruction during the majority of the school year. The preservice teachers participated in the student teaching placement for a total of twenty-eight weeks. During the first twentysix weeks, all classroom instruction was provided utilizing Google Meet as the instructional platform for full remote instruction. During the last two weeks, classroom instruction was provided through a hybrid model. For the hybrid model, the district provided both in-person and distance instruction simultaneously. Parents had the option of choosing the mode of instruction for their students. This resulted in the preservice teachers being required to develop positive rapport and relationships with students within a totally virtual distance learning environment during the first twenty-six weeks of the student teaching practicum and a hybrid model for the last two weeks. The participants in the study included eight of the preservice teachers from the student teaching cohort. The participants were white, middle-class females from Pennsylvania. The participants were all placed in an urban school setting with primarily Hispanic and ELL students. During the placement, the participants were assigned to a DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 43 primary classroom with a mentor teacher. The mentor teachers were also white, middleclass females. The mentor teachers played an important role in the preservice teacher’s practicum experience, as they provided individual guidance and support. The mentor teacher was responsible for delegating teaching responsibilities to the preservice teacher as their comfort level and expertise increased. The mentor was also responsible for determining the balance between modeling instructional practices for student teachers to observe and providing opportunities for the student teacher to apply the strategies taught by leading instruction with the students. Over the course of the practicum, the mentor teachers exerted a powerful influence on the attitudes and practices of the preservice teachers. For the study, four of the participants were assigned to a lower primary (Kindergarten to second grade) classroom and four were assigned to an upper primary (third to fourth grade) classroom. Google Classroom was the learning management system and instructional platform utilized throughout the study to provide all content instruction. During the second week of the semester, the researcher met with the studentteacher cohort to describe the purpose of the study and extend an invitation to participate. The student teachers were informed that participation in the study would include an individual interview prior to and after conducting the intervention, four classroom observations, and the submission of four journal reflections. The student teachers were also informed that their participation in the study was voluntary, and they could end their participation in the study at any time. Then, the student teachers were provided with the DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 44 Informed Participant Consent (Appendix B) to complete to communicate their interests in participating in the study. Intervention and Research Plan After the pre-intervention interviews, an intervention plan was implemented to provide the participants with specific strategies they could utilize to build positive relationships with the students in their class. The intervention occurred during the months of January, February, and March, as the participants were in the full-time teaching component of their student teaching practicum from 8:00 am to 3:00 pm five days a week. Over the course of the three months, the participants were expected to gradually teach each content area, leading up to a full load of teaching responsibilities by the last month of the practicum. As they assumed more responsibilities for teaching, the participants would need to establish and maintain positive relationships with the students. For this reason, the intervention plan was developed. The purpose of the intervention was to provide strategy instruction for building positive teacher-student relationships and to establish a learning community for discussions and idea-sharing among the participants. The text selected for the book study was Engaging Students with Poverty in Mind: Practical Strategies for Raising Achievement by Eric Jensen. This book was selected due to the emphasis on making the classrooms relevant, engaging, and full of affirming relationships for students of poverty (Jenson, 2013). The book also explained crucial factors for engaging students from low socio-economic communities and provided specific strategies for creating a high-energy, engaging, and positive class climate to foster student success. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 45 For the intervention, the study participants engaged with each other as a community of learners to learn strategies for building positive teacher-student relationships, participating in discussions about the need for the strategies, and determining how the strategies could be integrated into the classroom instruction. During the intervention, study participants read a chapter of the book each week and participated in a discussion through Zoom. The book discussions were held once a week after school for one hour. Each week, one of the study participants facilitated a presentation and discussion on one chapter from the book. During the presentations, the participants provided an overview of the chapter and planned a discussion activity to apply the strategies from their chapter. After reading the chapter and participating in the discussion, the participants incorporated the strategies from the chapter into their lesson plans and identified how the strategy would be implemented during their lessons. Fiscal Implications The implementation of the intervention during the student teaching practicum comes with financial implications, including the stipend for mentor teachers and the cost associated with the text used for the professional reading. When placing preservice teachers in a student teaching placement for the practicum experience, a mentor teacher must be assigned. This financial commitment cost the university approximately $400 per mentor teacher for the length of the practicum experience. With an average cohort size of 18 preservice teachers, the budget for the mentor stipend would be approximately $7,200. The text used for the study cost $26.95. The preservice teachers are responsible for the cost of the text. For an average cohort of 18 preservice teachers, the cost of the text would be approximately $485. The budget for the student teaching practicum experience DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 46 should be determined by the current program enrollment numbers, with additional budgeting for students who may transfer from another university to participate in the practicum experience. Research Design, Methods, and Data Collection The researcher chose a mixed-methods approach to address the research questions. The mixed-methods approach integrated qualitative and quantitative data and enabled the researcher to utilize the strengths of each type while simultaneously addressing aspects that could be considered weaknesses or limitations (Mertler, 2019). The researcher implemented the mixed-methods design with a greater emphasis on qualitative rather than quantitative data collection. Phenomenological research was the qualitative research design. The benefit of the phenomenological approach is that it can be used to describe and interpret experiences from the participants’ perspectives (Mertens, 2005). A descriptive research design was utilized for the quantitative research. The purpose of the descriptive design was to “describe and interpret the current status of individuals, settings, conditions, or events” (Mertler, 2019, p. 95). Quantitative data for the study was collected through pre-and post-intervention interviews, participant lesson plans, and observations. The collection of the quantitative data was to reduce bias and to provide reliable and precise data to determine the extent to which preservice teachers incorporated relationship-building strategies into their instructional practices during distance learning. However, because quantitative data does not explain the meaning and context, the researcher also collected qualitative data through the pre-and post-intervention interviews, participant journals, and the participants’ written lesson reflections. By incorporating qualitative data, the researcher DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 47 was able to explore the experiences of the participants, which provided depth and context for the data. The researcher also used the qualitative data to determine the perceptions of preservice teachers regarding the skills necessary to establish, develop and maintain positive relationships within a distance learning classroom environment. The proposed research plan was approved by the Head of the Division of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences at the branch campus on August 14, 2020. The plan was submitted to the Institutional Research Board (IRB) at the California University of Pennsylvania on August 19, 2020. The IRB confirmed the approval of the research project on September 16, 2020. A copy of the approval letter is attached as Appendix A. Prior to starting the study, the principals at the three urban schools, where the university had an established relationship for placing student teachers, were contacted. The principals were asked to identify experienced mentor teachers for the student teaching placements. The preservice teachers in the cohort were then asked to identify their top three grade-level preferences. Afterward, the preservice teachers’ grade level preferences and the lists of available schools, mentors, and grade levels were compared. Then, the preservice teachers were assigned to a student teaching placement for the fall and spring semesters. Once the placements were determined and the research plan was approved, the researcher held a Zoom meeting with the preservice teachers in the student-teacher cohort. During the meeting, the researcher described the research study, the role of the study participants, and the planned data collection methods to the preservice teachers. The participants were informed that their participation in this study was completely voluntary. They were also informed of their right to end their participation in the study at DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 48 any time with no questions asked or consequences for withdrawing from the study. The researcher informed the participants that the focus of the research was to study the perceptions of preservice teachers regarding the skills necessary to establish, develop, and maintain positive relationships within a distance learning classroom environment. Their participation in this study would assist the researcher in learning more about the preservice teachers’ dispositions for developing positive student and teacher relationships, the extent to which preservice teachers incorporate engagement strategies into their instructional practices, and their ability to recognize when adjustments needed to be made to maintain a positive student-teacher relationship. The researcher explained that individual interviews would be conducted at the initial and ending stages of the study. The interviews would be recorded and transcribed by the researcher, with all identifying information removed from the transcripts. After the meeting, the preservice teachers were invited to participate in the study and the researcher disseminated the participant consent form through email (Appendix B). The fifteen student teachers signed the consent form to express interest in participating in the study. From the cohort of fifteen preservice teachers, the researcher randomly selected eight to participate in the study. The researcher chose only eight preservice teachers to participate in the study due to the required time needed for the preintervention and post-intervention interviews and the number of individual observations necessary to adequately observe the application of the intervention. All preservice teachers received the intervention instruction, however data was only collected on the eight preservice teachers who were randomly selected. After the participants were selected, the study began during the third week of the fall semester. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 49 The research study included a pre-study intervention phase, the application of the intervention, and finally a post-study intervention phase. The artifacts used for data collection during each phase of the study included interviews, observations, journal reflections, and lesson plan reviews. During the pre-study intervention phase, the researcher held individual pre-intervention interviews, collected the initial journal reflection, and conducted baseline observations. The pre-intervention interviews were conducted by the researcher using Zoom and the pre-study interview questions (Appendix C). The pre-intervention interview questions were used to gather baseline data on the preservice teachers’ initial knowledge and implementation of relationship-building strategies to develop positive relationships with students and their perceptions of indicators of positive teacher-student relationships. During the pre-intervention phase, the participants were asked to plan and deliver a rapport activity to get to know the students in their class. The participants implemented the rapport activity with students during the first month of the student teaching placement. Following the activity, the participants wrote a prompted journal reflection on the rapport activity. Within the reflection, participants were asked to explain the activity, how the students responded, and their perception of the impact of the activity. The data collected from this artifact was used to analyze the participants’ reflections on their initial attempts to build rapport with the students. The pre-study interview, rapport activity, and reflection provided the baseline data for the study. During the third and fourth week of the student teaching placement, the research conducted baseline observations of the participants as they delivered a morning meeting lesson to the students through Google Meet. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 50 After the baseline data was collected, the intervention was applied during the first two months of the spring semester, when the participants were in their full-time student teaching placement. During the intervention phase, the participants were provided with relationship-building strategies that could be applied within the elementary school setting. An overview of the strategies was presented, along with examples of how the strategies could be adapted for different grade levels, as outlined in Table 1. Table 1 Intervention Strategies for Building Positive Teacher-Student Relationships According to Jensen, 2013 Positive Attitude • use affirmations • employ small engagers • give yourself permission to make mistakes Encourage Interactions • share about yourself • respect students • incorporate interactive language Get Buy-in • accentuate student interests • offer an incentive • pique students’ curiosity Embrace clarity • use fewer words • frame directions positively • give clear, simple directions Show Passion • stay active • vary voice intentionally • keep eyes focused on students • focus on what you want to happen DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 51 Manage Mind-Body States • reduce lecture time. • eliminate the “fight, flight, or freeze” response • give students more control • ask compelling questions • keep students in suspense Establish a Classroom Community • form cooperative groups • get to know you activities • help students gain social status Sustain Emotional Positivity • use emotional punctuation. • provide positive classroom responses • accentuate the positive • use variety in your celebrations Teach Positive Social and Emotional Responses • model appropriate responses • teach responses with fun activities During the intervention phase, the researcher collected data through journal reflections and two observations of the participants leading instruction. The study participants maintained weekly journal reflections where they described the strategies implemented to build a supportive teacher-student relationship with the students. The journal reflections were uploaded to Canvas, the learning management system utilized by the university. The observations were conducted as the participants delivered a lesson to students on Google Meet. The researcher joined the meeting with the computer camera off and microphone muted, as to not distract the students. The data collected from the observations and journal reflections were used to determine if participation in a community of learners had an influence on the participants’ perceptions of the need to DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 52 build positive teacher-student relationships and how the participants incorporated the strategies when leading instruction with students. After the intervention was applied, the study shifted to the post-intervention phase during the last month of the spring semester. During this phase of the study, the researcher collected post-intervention data on the extent to which the preservice teachers incorporated the relationship-building strategies into their delivery of instruction during distance learning. The researcher also conducted a post-intervention final interview with each participant. The post-intervention interviews were conducted by the researcher using Zoom and the post-intervention interview questions (Appendix D). Prior to completing the practicum experience, the participants developed a closing rapport activity and implemented it with the students. After completing the activity, the participants wrote a final prompted journal reflection on the indicators of an established positive teacherstudent relationship. The final journal reflection was uploaded to Canvas. The researcher also conducted one post-intervention observation of the participants leading instruction with the students through Google Meet. Data was also collected on the participants’ perceptions of indicators of positive teacher and student relationships in a distance learning environment. Data collection methods were implemented in an effort to address the research questions and to determine if the data collection methods yielded comparable results. The first method of data collection was the semi-structured pre-intervention and postintervention interviews, utilizing both planned questions and following up questions for the participants to expand on their responses. The interview questions were developed by the researchers to identify the participants’ experience observing and implementing DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 53 relationship-building strategies. The characteristics of semi-structured interviews, as defined by Cohen and Crabtree (2006) include: (1) the interviewer and respondents engage in a formal interview, (2) the interviewer develops and uses an 'interview guide.' This is a list of questions and topics that need to be covered during the conversation, usually in a particular order, and (3) the interviewer follows the guide, but is able to follow topical trajectories in the conversation that may stray from the guide when he or she feels this is appropriate” (para. 1). According to Hendricks (2017), semi-structured interviews are “a good way to make sure that questions important to the researcher are answered while providing participants with an opportunity to add other useful information” (p.92). “The semi-structured interview guide provides a clear set of instructions for interviewers and can provide reliable, comparable qualitative data” (Cohen and Crabtree, 2006, p.2). The pre-intervention and post-intervention interview questions are provided in Appendix C and D. Data for the study was also collected through quantitative observations. Quantitative observational studies enable the researcher to focus on specific behaviors that can be quantified (Leedy and Ormrod, 2013). The strength of observational data is that it allows the researcher to see, hear, and describe the complexity of behaviors (Mertler, 2019), which is more natural and less restrictive. For this study, observations were conducted through the Google Meet platform. The researcher joined the Google meeting prior to the start of the lesson to observe the interactions between the students and the preservice teachers prior to, during, and after the delivery of instruction. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 54 There are also limitations to observational data collection due to the amount of time needed to conduct the observations, the advanced planning, and the attention to detail required (Leedy & Ormond, 2013). For this study, the observation data were collected through an observation rubric and narrative descriptions. During the observations, the researcher utilized the data analysis checklist (Marzano, 2005) to track the specific behaviors of the study participants as they interacted with students and tallied the number of times the interactions occurred (Appendix E). After the observations, a narrative description was written to provide detailed contextual information. The observation data were also recorded in the form of field notes as written observations of the events occurring in a specific setting (Mertler, 2019). The researcher collected the field notes by using a two-column chart. In one column, information from the actual observation was recorded. In the second column, the researcher wrote the preliminary interpretations of what was being observed. The interpretations are referred to as the observer’s comments (Bogdan and Biklen, 2007). The comments show the emerging patterns from the data and provide the researcher with the ability to integrate ongoing data analysis into the process of conducting qualitative research (Mertler, 2019). Another form of data collected for the study was artifacts of work and products created by the participants, including lesson plans and self-reflection journals. Artifacts were collected for qualitative inquiry data to identify participant thoughts, perceptions, and experiences related to the research questions (Hendricks, 2017). Through the selfreflection journals, the study participants maintained a narrative account of their reflection of their practice (Mertler, 2019). With the self-reflection journals, prompts were used for the pre-intervention and post-intervention interviews to ensure that DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING information relevant to the research questions was collected. Participant-generated artifacts included lesson plans to determine if the participants were incorporating strategies from the book study into their instructional plans. The data collection plan is provided in Table 2. Table 2 Data Collection Timeline August/September 2020 Planning Phase • • September/October 2020 Pre-intervention Phase November 2020/December 2020 Pre-intervention Phase January 2021 Intervention Phase February 2021 Intervention Phase March 2021 Post-Intervention Phase April 2021 Post-Intervention Phase • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Finalize interview questions and determine interview format Identify study participants (determine the size of the participant group, determine if participants will be in the same grade level or represent different grade levels) Meet with study participants to communicate the introduction and overview of the study Administer baseline interviews Collect initial journal reflection Conduct baseline observations Analyze baseline interviews, journal reflections, and observations Identify appropriate intervention Conduct observations Collect journal reflections Administer intervention Conduct observations Collect journal reflections Administer intervention Administer final interviews Collect final journal reflection Conduct final observations Analyze baseline and final interview Analyze observation data Analyze journal reflections 55 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 56 Multiple data sources were used to answer the research questions. The first research question sought to identify if preservice teachers incorporated relationshipbuilding strategies into their instruction to develop positive teacher and student relationships in a distance learning environment. To answer this question, the researcher conducted semi-structured interviews during the pre-intervention and post-intervention phases to uncover the participants’ perceptions on the need for relationship-building strategies and their experience implementing strategies within the classroom setting prior to and after the intervention. Additional data to answer this question was gathered through four observations over the course of the study, with the goal of identifying how the participants incorporated relationship-building strategies into their lessons. The artifacts collected for this question included four lesson plans written by the preservice teachers. The lesson plans were used to identify if the engagement strategies were being incorporated within the instructional planning, and the extent to which the strategies were evident. The second research question sought to determine the preservice teachers’ perceived indicators of emerging positive teacher-student relationships during distance learning. To answer this question, the researcher collected prompted journal entries from the participants for the purpose of uncovering the participants’ thoughts and reflections on their efforts to build relationships with the students. The third research question sought to identify the ways in which distance learning impacted the development of positive classroom relationships between the preservice teacher and the students. To answer this question, the researcher conducted semistructured interviews and lesson observations to identify how and when the relationship- DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 57 building strategies were incorporated into the distance learning classroom environment. Data was also gathered on the participants’ perspectives on the need for positive and supportive teacher-student relationships in the distance learning environment. Validity Validity within a research study is the extent to which the results provide an accurate measurement of what the data was intended to measure (Mertler, 2019). The validity of the data is determined by the it’s trustworthiness, accuracy, and believability (Mertler, 2019). In an effort to establish the validity, the researcher utilized multiple forms of data collection including interviews, observations, and participant artifacts to triangulate the data. The researcher ensured that each data collection measurement was targeted to respond to each research question. According to Hendricks (2017), collecting multiple sources of data is a necessary step in action research. When researchers use multiple sources to corroborate findings, the credibility of those findings is increased (p.65). According to Rossman and Rallis (2012), triangulation “helps ensure that you have not studied only a fraction of the complexity that you seek to understand” (p.65). Summary The primary purpose of this mixed-methods research study was to gain an understanding of the perception and ability of preservice teachers placed in a diverse school setting to develop positive teacher-student relationships when instruction is taught in a distance learning environment. The secondary purpose was to determine how the skill of creating a supportive classroom environment community emerges within a distance learning classroom environment, and investigate the role of a professional development book study to teach strategies for relationship-building. 58 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING The intervention applied through the action research study included facilitated discussions on relationship building strategies from the book Engaging Students with Poverty in Mind: Practical Strategies for Raising Achievement. Through the book study, the participants were exposed to relationship-building strategies to support the development of positive teacher-student relationships in the distance learning environment. The intervention was intended to improve the overall ability of the preservice teachers to engage with students in a distance learning environment and create a positive and supportive classroom environment. Based on the research included in the literature review, by improving the ability and effectiveness of the preservice teachers to create a positive and supportive distance learning classroom environment, the teacher is able to build positive and supportive relationships with students. During the study, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected over a seven-month period. The data was triangulated to monitor participant growth and utilization of relationship-building strategies to analyze the effectiveness of the intervention. The analysis of the data and results of the study will be provided in Chapter IV. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 59 CHAPTER IV Data Analysis and Results During the student-teaching practicum experience, preservice teachers are expected to develop positive and supportive relationships with students as they gain experience planning and delivering instruction. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the practicum experience would include a field placement in a classroom of students with a mentor teacher. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the structure of instruction in K-12 schools changed drastically from full in-person delivery of instruction to online distance learning. Although the mode of instruction had changed, preservice teachers who enrolled in a student-teaching practicum experience were still expected to develop a positive and supportive relationship with the students. The student teachers participating in the study were enrolled in a year-long practicum experience. During the practicum experience, all classroom instruction was delivered in a distance learning environment through Google Meet. The researcher examined three aspects of the student teaching experience including the ability of the preservice teachers to incorporate strategies to develop positive teacher and student relationships while delivering instruction through distance learning, the preservice teachers’ perception of the indicators of an emerging positive teacher-student relationship during distance learning, and the impact of distance learning on positive relationships between preservice teachers and students. The results from this study provided valuable findings on the training needed during the teacher preparation program to prepare preservice teachers to purposefully create positive and supportive relationships with students during online field experiences. Generalizations from the results of the study DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 60 benefit the school district and mentor teachers working with preservice teachers during distance learning instruction and teacher preparation programs that train preservice teachers. The data collection timeline was implemented to gather data through the specific sequence as outlined in Table 2 on page 57, with the analysis of the data occurring concurrently. The researcher conducted interviews, lesson observations, and collected journal reflections during the beginning, mid-point, and end of the study. To ensure the validity of the data collected, the researcher incorporated the use of both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. First, the researcher administered the baseline preintervention interview (Appendix C) with the purpose of identifying emerging themes from participant responses. Then baseline observations were conducted, and the initial journal reflections were collected. The pre-intervention interviews were recorded, and the researcher transcribed the interviews. Once all the interviews were transcribed, the researcher initiated the process of coding each interview separately. By coding the interviews separately, each interview was coded as an independent data set. Once all the interviews were coded, the researcher identified themes to categorize the data from the set of interviews. After the baseline pre-intervention interviews were completed, an initial classroom observation of each participant was conducted. The researcher collected the classroom observation data using the observation rubric (Appendix E) to identify the utilization of specific engagement and relationship-building strategies. During the observation, the researcher tallied the use of the observed strategies and noted direct and summarized quotes from the participants. Following the classroom observations, the observation rubric and notes were coded, and consistent themes were identified. In DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 61 addition to the interviews and observations, the researcher collected an initial journal reflection from each participant. The study participants planned and delivered a rapport activity with their class of students and wrote a prompted journal reflection on the activity. The researcher reviewed each journal reflection and coded them separately as an individual data set. After the journal reflections were coded, the researcher identified themes to categorize the data from the set of reflections. From the initial data collection gathered from the interviews, observations, and journal reflections, the researcher developed a professional learning plan based on the common themes identified. The professional learning plan was implemented after the pre-intervention data collection and before the post-intervention data collection. A discussion of the professional learning plan will be presented later in this chapter. During the post-intervention data collection phase, a similar process was implemented to collect and analyze the data. The post-intervention interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded as independent data sets. The observation rubric was utilized during the post-intervention observation to tally the observed strategies. The researcher also recorded direct and summarized participant quotes during the observation. The prompted final journal reflection was coded as individual data sets, and emerging themes were identified to categorize the data. Once the final data collection was completed, the researcher analyzed the data to identify the resulting themes. Pre-Intervention Results The researcher conducted two phases of data collection and analysis. The first phase occurred at the beginning of the study, prior to implementing the intervention. The data collected during this phase was used to determine the participants’ knowledge and 62 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING experience implementing relationship-building strategies during instruction. The data collected included interviews, observations, and journal reflections. The analysis of the data informed the development of the professional learning plan, which was implemented with the participants over a span of three months. After implementing the professional learning plan, the researcher conducted the second phase of data collection. The process for the second phase mirrored the first phase and included interviews, observations, a review of lesson plans, and journal reflections. The purpose of the second phase of data collection was to determine the impact of the professional learning plan on the participants’ use of relationship-building strategies. In order to gain a clear understanding of the results of the study, it is necessary to analyze both the phase one pre-intervention data and phase two post-intervention data in relation to the shared themes. A discussion of the overall participant perceptions from pre-intervention to post-intervention is provided later in this chapter. Pre-Intervention Interviews Data from the phase one pre-intervention interviews (Appendix C) identified the participants’ experience working with elementary students, their understanding of the importance of a positive teacher-student relationship, strategies they observed being used, and a rating of their confidence to develop a positive relationship with students while teaching in a distance learning environment. Participants were asked to describe their experience working with or interacting with elementary students prior to the student teaching placement. Table 3 shows the number of participants whose only experience came from the university field experiences and the number who had experiences in addition to the university experiences. Five of the DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 63 participants had experience in an educational setting with elementary students prior to the student teaching placement. For three of the participants, their only experience with elementary students occurred during the university field experiences. Of the five participants who reported having experience outside of the university required field placements, their experience included babysitting, volunteering, or teaching elementary students. Table 3 Participant Experience Interacting with Elementary Students Experience Type University required field experiences only University required field experiences and outside experiences • In-home babysitting • Volunteering in a childcare setting or afterschool program • Teaching in a childcare setting or afterschool program Participants n=8 3 5 1 1 3 The participants were asked to share their thoughts on the importance of creating a positive teacher-student relationship and classroom environment. The participants all commented on the importance of having a positive relationship and classroom environment. Student Teacher 1 shared, “When you have a good relationship with the students they enjoy coming to school, they are excited to learn, and they will do what the teacher asks of them.” Student Teachers 8 and 5 stated that having a positive classroom environment helps to build relationships with the students. Student Teacher 5 said, “it’s DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 64 important to find ways to build a relationship with students by having conversations and being silly.” Student Teacher 7 explained, “it’s very important. It’s one of the main responsibilities of the classroom teacher. It helps the management of the classroom and the student’s attitude, effort and respect towards the teacher.” She went on to describe a classroom experience where she determined that a positive teacher-student relationship was not present. “During one of my placements, I observed a teacher yelling at the students. The students didn’t respect her and acted out by yelling and bullying each other. Their behavior was a reflection of what the teacher was modeling.” Other participants also expressed their thoughts on the importance of creating a positive classroom environment and teacher-student relationships by sharing observations of when it was missing. Student Teacher 4 shared an observation in a classroom where the students did not have a positive relationship with the classroom aide because she made the students uncomfortable by commenting on the academic ability of the students. Student Teachers 3 and 6 both shared that a positive classroom environment is important so that the students will like you and listen to you. Student Teacher 2 shared, “having a positive classroom environment is important so that the students enjoy being there.” The participants were then asked to provide examples of strategies they observed teachers using to support the development of positive teacher-student relationships. Student Teacher 8 shared that she observed a teacher build personal connections with students by demonstrating an interest in things the students liked. Student Teacher 1 said, “The teacher took an interest in the students and acknowledged specific things about them such as haircuts, siblings, and things the students liked.” Student Teacher 4 explained how the teacher used lots of positive reinforcements by saying, “I love how DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 65 (student name) (student behavior).” Student Teacher 5 shared how the teacher modeled positive peer interactions and school behaviors for the students, then explained why they were important for the class to run smoothly. Student Teachers 7 and 2 described the teacher actions they observed. Student Teacher 7, “The teacher got down on the students’ level to talk to them, greeting them as they entered the room, and made the lessons fun and engaging.” Student Teacher 2, “the pre-school teacher encouraged us to eat with the students to talk to them and get to know them in a non-instructional setting.” Students 3 and 6 commented on how the teachers were really friendly and consistently spoke kindly towards the students. Next, the participants were asked to rate their confidence in their ability to develop positive relationships with students. Table 4 shows the participants’ responses from highly confident to not confident. The responses indicate that half of the participants were highly confident or confident, and the other half were a little confident to not confident. One participant rated herself as highly confident in her ability to develop positive teacher-student relationships with students, and three participants rated themselves as confident. One participant rated herself as a little confident in her ability to develop positive teacher-student relationships with students, and three participants rated themselves as not confident. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 66 Table 4 Level of Confidence in Developing Positive Relationships with Students Confidence level (pre-intervention) Highly confident Self-rating n=8 1 Confident 3 A little confident 1 Not confident 3 The responses indicate that half of the participants were highly confident or confident, and the other half were a little confident to not confident. One participant rated herself as highly confident in her ability to develop positive teacher-student relationships with students, and three participants rated themselves as confident. One participant rated herself as having little confidence in her ability to develop positive teacher-student relationships with students, and 3 participants rated themselves as not confident. The participants were then asked to explain the self-rating of their confidence in their ability to develop positive teacher-student relationships with students. Student Teacher 1 rated herself as highly confident. She explained that she felt confident because “I taught preschool before, and it seemed to come naturally for me.” Student Teachers 4, 8, and 3 rated themselves as confident based on their prior experiences with children. Student Teacher 8 said, “I feel confident because of my background knowledge and experience working with students.” Student Teacher 4 stated, “I’m always around kids. I’m able to connect with them.” Student Teacher 3 responded, “I babysit a lot of kids, and they seem to enjoy having me around.” Student Teacher 2 rated herself as having only a little confidence in developing a relationship with students. She said, “I haven’t done this DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 67 before. I’m really nervous about how the students will respond to me.” Student Teacher 7 made a similar statement, but rated herself as not having confidence in her ability to develop a relationship with students. Student Teachers 5 and 6 also rated themselves as not having confidence, but for different reasons. Student Teacher 5 stated, “I’m not confident in how to get students to talk and share their thoughts. Student Teacher 6 stated, “I’m not confident because I’m worried that I won’t know what to do.” The participants were then asked to rate their confidence in their ability to develop positive relationships with students in a distance learning environment. Table 5 shows the participants’ responses from highly confident to not confident. For this question, the responses indicated that the majority of the participants were not confident in their ability to develop positive teacher-student relationships with students in a distance learning environment. Six of the eight participants rated themselves as not confident in developing positive teacher-student relationships with students in a distance learning environment. One participant rated herself as having a little confidence and one participant rated herself as confident. Table 5 Pre-Intervention Level of Confidence During Distance Learning Confidence level Highly confident Self-rating n=8 - Confident 1 A little confident 1 Not confident 6 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 68 The participants were then asked to explain the self-rating of their confidence in their ability to develop a positive teacher-student relationship with students in a distance learning environment. Of the six participants who responded as being not confident, many of their reasons for responding this way were similar. Student Teacher 4 explained that distance learning makes her nervous. She said, “I don’t know how can you connect with someone on a screen?” Student Teacher 1 said, “I don’t feel confident because I don’t know how I’m going to fit everything in. I won’t be able to talk to the students. How will I get to know them and learn about their interest?” Student Teachers 2 and 7 explained that their lack of confidence was because they weren’t comfortable with technology. Student Teachers 6 and 5 expressed that they weren’t sure what to do because they have never seen anyone teach online before. Student Teacher 3 expressed some confidence in her ability to develop positive teacher-student relationships with students in a distance learning environment. She said, “I have a lot of experience with children, I don’t think it will be too different.” Student Teacher 8 felt confident and explained, “I have a good understanding of technology, so I feel confident that I will be able to use technology to interact with the students.” Pre-Intervention Observations The researcher observed the participants as they taught their initial lessons with students. The lessons were taught online using Google Meet. For the lesson, all participants taught the morning meeting. The required components of the lesson consisted of a greeting, movement activity, and calendar review. The participants could choose to include an activity, read aloud, or a content-based mini-lesson for review. The researcher observed the lesson and collected data on the utilization of strategies for building positive DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 69 teacher-student relationships (Appendix E). The data collected during the preintervention observations is provided in Table 6. The data collected during observation one before the application of the intervention indicated participant strengths in three of the nine relationship-building strategies, including showing passion, establishing a classroom community, and teaching positive social and emotional responses. The utilization of the strategies for having a positive attitude and establishing a classroom community was effectively implemented by all eight of the participants. The strategy of teaching positive social and emotional responses was utilized by seven of the participants. The strategy of showing passion was utilized by six of the participants. The majority of the participants did not demonstrate the use of five of the nine strategies, including encouraging interactions, getting buy-in, embracing clarity, managing mind-body states, and sustaining emotional positivity. The strategies for encouraging interactions, embracing clarity, and sustaining emotional positivity were utilized by four of the participants. Two of the participants incorporated the use of the strategy for getting buy-in. None of the participants incorporated the use of the strategy for managing mind-body states. 70 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Table 6 Pre-Intervention Strategy Use Strategy and actions Observation one (before intervention) ST3 ST4 ST5 ST6 ST1 ST2 ST7 ST8 Positive attitude Use affirmations Employ small engagers Give yourself permission to make mistakes Y N N N Y N Y N Encourage Interactions Share about yourself Respect students Incorporate interactive language Y N N Y Y N Y N Get buy-in Accentuate student interests Offer an incentive Pique students’ curiosity N N N N Y N Y N Embrace clarity Use fewer words Frame directions positively Give clear, simple directions Y Y N N N N Y Y Show passion Stay active Vary voice intentionally Keep eyes focused on students Focus on what you want to happen Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Manage Mind-Body States Reduce lecture time. Eliminate the “fight, flight, or freeze” response Give students more control Ask compelling questions Keep students in suspense N N N N N N N N Establish a Classroom Community Form cooperative groups Get to know you activities Help students gain social status Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 71 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Strategy and actions ST1 ST2 Observation one (before intervention) ST3 ST4 ST5 ST6 Sustain Emotional Positivity Use emotional punctuation. Provide positive classroom responses Accentuate the positive Use variety in your celebrations N Y N Y Y N Y N Teach Positive Social and Emotional Responses Model appropriate responses Teach responses with fun activities Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y ST7 ST8 Note. ST = Student Teacher Pre-Intervention Journal Reflections The data from the participants’ pre-intervention journal reflections indicated three emerging themes about the development of positive teacher-student relationships in a distance learning environment. The themes included the importance of rapport-building activities, the challenges of developing relationships in a distance learning environment, and their perceptions of the need for, and impact of, positive teacher-student relationships. Student Teachers 1, 3, and 4 commented on the importance of implementing rapport-building activities. Student Teacher 1 shared, “the goal of this activity was to begin to develop relationships between myself and the students, my mentor teacher and the students, as well as amongst the students in the class.” Student Teacher 4 shared, “the goal was to learn more about the students, and for the students to learn more about each other. Many students had things in common, such as pets and older or younger siblings, so I believe this helped the students to build rapport amongst themselves. Student Teacher 3 explained: DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 72 The goal of this activity was to build a relationship with my students and for the students to build a relationship with one another. I think I accomplished this. I will definitely include rapport-building activities in my classroom. Without them, I do not think the students will create a bond or develop open lines of communication. Taking the time during the first week and even throughout the school year to build those relationships can help to create such a positive classroom environment. Student Teachers 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 reflected on the challenges of developing relationships in a distance learning environment. Student Teachers 1 and 7 both commented on the technology challenge of not being able to see all the students in the class on the screen at the same time. Student Teacher 7 shared this as a challenge because “I couldn’t see if they were engaged and enjoying the activity.” Student Teacher 5 shared the challenge of students being in different locations: Some students were at a daycare center during class. They could not find anything at their daycare that they thought was special enough to share with their class. If I had a chance to go back and change this activity, I would explain the activity the day before so that students could be prepared regardless of where they were located when they logged into the class meeting. Student Teachers 6 and 8 commented that doing the activity in a distance learning environment was a challenge. Student Teacher 8 said: It’s difficult to build relationships with students online. If I was doing the rapport activity in the classroom, I would have done it differently, and it would have been DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 73 more effective in helping the students to get to know each other and for me to get to know them. Student Teacher 6 stated, “It was challenging to do the rapport activity online. Doing this activity in class would give students the opportunity to see each other, feel the emotions in the class, and be active and motivated for the day ahead.” The participants also shared their perceptions about the impact of the rapport activity. Seven of the eight participants expressed a positive perception of the impact of doing the rapport activity in the distance learning setting. While one participant shared that she did not have a positive perception of the impact of doing the activity in the distance learning setting. The participant responses include the following: Student Teacher 1: My activity went well. I think most of the children enjoyed it because they were smiling and actively participating. I think doing this activity with the class helped them to feel more comfortable with me. Before doing the activity, they seemed unsure of my purpose for being in the classroom. After the activity, I noticed that, even though they called me “other teacher,” they said good morning to me and were more responsive towards me. Student Teacher 2: I believe this activity was successful. The students were engaged and ready to share their drawings with the class. The connections the students made during this activity seemed to create a positive classroom community. Throughout the activity, I worked to remind students of similarities in their answers and created my own positive connection to them. Student Teacher 3: I wanted them to learn about me and learn about each other, as well. I tried to ask questions that were not the normal introduction questions. I DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 74 wanted them to think outside the box with the questions I asked. I think the activity went well. All the students were focused and participated. Everyone was putting their answers in the chat box. I think the students learned some new things about one another and seemed to get to know me better, as well. It was the first interaction the students really had with me, so it opened a new door for them to communicate with me. There were a lot of positive comments. The students were laughing and having conversations with one another. They were making connections and learning who had the same interests as them. Student Teacher 4: The rapport activity was extremely successful; the students couldn’t wait to share their special objects and even commented on objects the other students shared using the chat box. A few students were shy at first, but after I started asking follow-up questions, they were more willing to open up and talk about their objects. I also believe it helped break the ice between me and the students. It was fun to also share about myself with the students. Student Teacher 5: I believe this activity helped create a positive classroom community because the students had a chance to share their special items with the class. Student Teacher 6: I would say the activity was very successful and created a positive classroom community because each student participated and respected each other when sharing. Each student was smiling, laughing, and listening carefully to their classmates, so they could give a reply. Student Teacher 7: After doing the rapport activity, I could see the students becoming more comfortable with me. For example, before the activity, the DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 75 students only greeted my mentor at the beginning and end of a lesson. After the rapport activity, I noticed that the students started to say hello and goodbye to me too. I started to feel like I was part of the class. Student Teacher 8: The activity would have been better if I did it in the classroom and not online. It would have been more effective in helping the students to get to know each other and for the teachers to get to know their students. Professional Learning Plan The analysis of the phase one data informed the development of the professional learning plan as the intervention. The professional learning plan was implemented to instruct the participants on relationship-building strategies to support the development of positive teacher-student relationships in the distance learning environment. The professional learning plan consisted of three target goals. The first target goal was to develop the participants’ understanding of the need for positive teacher-student relationships. The professional learning topics included developing a positive climate, student engagement, building cognitive capacity, increasing motivation and effort, and automating engagement. In addition to these topics, additional emphasis was spent correlating the concepts to students of diversity and poverty. The second target goal emphasized strategies for building positive teacher-student relationships. The participants were provided with relationship-building strategies that could be applied with the elementary students. An overview of the strategies was presented along with examples of how the strategies could be adapted for different grade levels as outlined in Table 1 on page 52. The strategies that were introduced and modeled for the participants. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 76 The third target goal of the professional learning plan was to establish a learning community for discussions about the strategies. The participants engaged in a weekly book discussion to grow as a community of learners. The book discussions were focused on learning the strategies for building positive teacher-student relationships, discussing the need for the strategies, identifying how the strategies could be integrated during instruction, and sharing additional ideas for relationship building with adaptations for grades Kindergarten to fourth grade. After reading the chapter and participating in the chapter discussion, the participants incorporated the strategies from the book into their lesson plans and reflected on the effectiveness of the strategies implemented. Post-Intervention Results After implementing the professional learning plan, the researcher conducted the second phase of data collection. The process for the second phase mirrored the first phase and included interviews, observations, and journal reflections. The second phase of the data collection was used to determine the impact of the professional learning plan on the participants’ use of relationship-building strategies in a distance learning environment. Post-Intervention Interviews The participants were asked to provide examples of strategies they observed their mentor teachers use to develop positive teacher-student relationships in a distance learning environment. The participants identified the method of encouraging interactions as a common strategy they observed their mentor teachers utilize. Student Teachers 1, 3, and 4 shared how their mentor teacher engaged the students by making personal connections. Student Teacher 4 shared, “my mentor shared information about herself, and made personal connections to students.” Student Teacher 1 said, “my mentor made DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 77 connections with the students by making positive comments about things they cared about such as, pets, siblings, something they were wearing, or something she could see in their home.” Student Teacher 3 shared, “my mentor made a connection with the students by sharing that she had a son in the same grade. She would share that she understood how learning online was different. Making this personal connection helped to put the students at ease.” Three participants discussed how their mentor teacher used the Google meeting structure to develop a positive relationship with the students. Student Teacher 8 explained: My mentor teacher would enter the Google meeting early each day to talk to students. She provided sharing time during morning meetings and the first class session after lunch. She would also identify common interests with the students through books. Student Teacher 2 shared how her mentor teacher greeted each student as they entered the Google meeting and found common interests between the students and herself. Student Teacher 7 said: My mentor teacher would join the Google meeting early and stayed on after class time to allow the students time to talk to her. During morning meetings, she provided time for discussions and informal interactions between the students by allowing them to ask questions. She was always cheerful and made sure she didn’t embarrass students when she needed to correct behavior. Student Teachers 5 and 6 also reported how their mentor teachers used morning meeting time for relationship building. Student Teacher 5 shared, “My mentor used morning meeting time to talk to the students and get to know them better. She also used humor to DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 78 alleviate stressful situations, especially when the students were having difficulty learning online and didn’t understand what to do.” Student Teacher 6 shared how her mentor used morning meeting time to talk to students about their after school activities and their weekend plans. The researcher asked participants to provide examples of strategies they implemented to develop positive teacher-student relationships in the distance learning environment. There were two strategies that participants primarily utilized. The first was the strategy of encouraging interactions by sharing about yourself. The second strategy was establishing a classroom community by learning the students’ strengths, talents, and by using getting to know you activities. Two participants shared how they worked to develop positive relationships with students before starting their daily instruction in a Google meeting. Student Teacher 1 shared how she would join the Google meeting early to greet students as they entered. “ I would use this time to ask questions about their home activities and interest. Student Teacher 2 also greeted students as they entered the Google meeting and developed high-energy lessons that incorporated the students’ interests and brain breaks to maintain student engagement and focus. Student Teacher 5 discussed the use of high-energy lessons to sustain emotional positivity. She explained, “I was energetic and animated during lessons. I asked a lot of questions to engage students in discussions and provided multiple opportunities for the students to share their interests and make personal connections.” The participants also discussed how they incorporated social-emotional check-ins to develop the class community and learn more about the students. Student Teacher 4 shared how she started her morning meetings with a social- DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 79 emotional check-in for students to share how they were feeling emotionally. She explained, Sometimes the students would share how much they wanted to go back to school. Then the other students would chime in to say they felt the same way. I think that helped all the students to see that weren’t alone in the way they were feeling. Providing interactive activities was another strategy used by the participants. Student Teacher 7 shared: During morning meetings, I would let them talk, and I planned activities for them to socialize by playing a game or doing a Go Noodle. I also offered office hours at the end of the day for students to stay in the Google meeting to talk to me. This provided time for the students to share their thoughts and anything they wanted to talk about. Student Teacher 8 stated, “I used total physical response activities, fun games, and dances related to the lessons to engage students in the instruction.” Next, the researcher had the participants share indicators of an emerging positive teacher-student relationship. Four of the participants responded that classroom engagement and student participation had improved. Student Teacher 3 said, “I noticed that the students were more engaged in the lessons. It wasn’t a struggle to get them to participate. Student Teacher 5 explained, “The students were eager to participate and responded to questions. During class discussions, their hands would shoot up to respond and share their thoughts without the fear of not having the correct answer. They were willing to try.” Student Teacher 1 commented, “The students were eager to work with me DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 80 in small virtual groups. They started asking questions to get to know me better.” Student Teacher 8 said: The students became more engaged in the lessons. I could see the lightbulb moment when they understood something. They also started using their reward points on class games and activities or to have lunch with my mentor teacher and me in the Google meeting space. Student Teacher 6 shared, “The students starting coming to class early to show us toys and things at their house. I think they wanted to talk.” Two participants commented that students began to feel comfortable sharing their thoughts. Student Teacher 2 explained: The students became more vocal with their thoughts and opinions. They began to ask when they needed a brain break. I think the students were also positively influenced by things I would say. I started noticing that the students were making positive comments to encourage each other. Two participants also commented on observing a positive class community developing. Student Teacher 7 said: The students had positive attitudes during the lesson. I could see them smiling a lot, and they didn’t ask if it was time to leave the Google meeting. Many stayed after class to talk. When I said goodbye on Fridays, the students would say no, I love school. Student Teacher 4 shared, “By my last day with the students, they made pictures for me and just wanted to talk. They told me they missed me already. I think I made an impact on them, and they had an impact on me.” DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 81 Next, the researcher asked the participants to rate their confidence in developing positive relationships with students in a distance learning environment, following the student teaching field experience. Table 7 shows the participants’ responses from highly confident to not confident. For this question, the responses indicated that all participants rated themselves as either confident or highly confident in their ability to develop positive teacher-student relationships with students in a distance learning environment. Four participants rated themselves as confident, and four rated themselves as highly confident. Table 7 Post-Intervention Level of Confidence During Distance Learning Confidence Level Highly confident Self-rating n=8 4 Confident 4 A little confident - Not confident - Post-Intervention Observations The researcher observed the participants as they taught a content-based lesson mid-way through the application of the intervention. The observed lessons were taught online using Google Meet. The lessons were to address the content being taught at the grade level and be aligned to the state standards. The participants were required to design the instructional plan, sequence, and any activities included in the lesson. The researcher observed the lesson and collected data on the utilization of strategies for building positive 82 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING teacher-student relationships (Appendix E). The data collected during the intervention observation is provided in Table 8. Table 8 Strategy Use During Intervention Strategy and Actions Observation two (during intervention) ST3 ST4 ST5 ST6 Y Y Y N ST1 Y ST2 Y Encourage Interactions Share about yourself Respect students Incorporate interactive language Y Y N Y Y Get Buy-in Accentuate student interests Offer an incentive Pique students’ curiosity Y Y N Y Embrace Clarity Use fewer words Frame directions positively Give clear, simple directions Y Y N Show Passion Stay active Vary voice intentionally Keep eyes focused on students Focus on what you want to happen Y Y Manage Mind-Body States Reduce lecture time. Eliminate the “fight, flight, or freeze” response Give students more control Ask compelling questions Keep students in suspense N Y Positive Attitude Use affirmations Employ small engagers Give yourself permission to make mistakes ST7 Y ST8 Y N Y N Y Y Y N N N N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y Y N Y N 83 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Strategy and Actions ST1 Observation two (during intervention) ST2 ST3 ST4 ST5 ST6 Y Y ST7 ST8 Y Y Establish a Classroom Community Form cooperative groups Get to know you activities Help students gain social status Y Y Y Y Sustain Emotional Positivity Use emotional punctuation. Provide positive classroom responses Accentuate the positive Use variety in your celebrations Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Teach Positive Social and Emotional Responses Model appropriate responses Teach responses with fun activities Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Note. ST = Student Teacher The data collected from observation two, during the application of the intervention indicated participant strengths in seven of the nine strategies, including having a positive attitude, encouraging interactions, getting buy-in, showing passion, establishing a classroom community, sustaining emotional positivity, and teaching positive social and emotional responses. The strategy of establishing a classroom community was effectively implemented by all eight of the participants. The strategies of having a positive attitude, sustaining emotional positivity, and teaching positive social and emotional responses were utilized by seven of the participants. The strategies of encouraging interactions, getting buy-in, and showing passion were utilized by six of the participants. The majority of the participants did not demonstrate the use of two of the 84 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING nine strategies, which were embracing clarity, and managing mind-body states. These strategies were utilized by four of the participants. The researcher also collected data during observation three. For this observation, the participants taught a content-based lesson after the application of the intervention. The observed lessons were taught online using Google Meet. The lessons were to address the content being taught at the grade level and be aligned to the state standards. The participants were required to design the instructional plan, sequence, and any activities included in the lesson. The researcher observed the lesson and collected data on the utilization of strategies for building positive teacher-student relationships (Appendix E). The data collected during the post-intervention observation is provided in Table 9. Table 9 Post-Intervention Strategy Use Strategy and actions Observation three (after intervention) ST3 ST4 ST5 ST6 Y Y Y Y ST1 Y ST2 Y Encourage Interactions Share about yourself Respect students Incorporate interactive language Y Y Y Y Y Get Buy-in Accentuate student interests Offer an incentive Pique students’ curiosity Y Y Y Y Embrace Clarity Use fewer words Frame directions positively Give clear, simple directions Y Y N Y Positive Attitude Use affirmations Employ small engagers Give yourself permission to make mistakes ST7 Y ST8 Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y N Y 85 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Strategy and actions Observation three (after intervention) ST3 ST4 ST5 ST6 Y Y Y Y ST1 Y ST2 Y Manage Mind-Body States Reduce lecture time. Eliminate the “fight, flight, or freeze” response Give students more control Ask compelling questions Keep students in suspense Y Y Y Y Y Establish a Classroom Community Form cooperative groups Get to know you activities Help students gain social status Y Y Y Y Sustain Emotional Positivity Use emotional punctuation. Provide positive classroom responses Accentuate the positive Use variety in your celebrations Y Y N Teach Positive Social and Emotional Responses Model appropriate responses Teach responses with fun activities N Y N Show Passion Stay active Vary voice intentionally Keep eyes focused on students Focus on what you want to happen ST7 Y ST8 Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N N N Note. ST = Student Teacher The data collected for observation three, after the application of the intervention, indicated the participants’ strengths in eight of the nine strategies, including having a positive attitude, encouraging interactions, getting buy-in, embracing clarity, showing passion, managing mind-body states, establishing a classroom community, and sustaining emotional positivity. The strategies for having a positive attitude, encouraging interactions, showing passion, and establishing a classroom community were DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 86 implemented by all eight of the participants. The strategy of sustaining emotional positivity was utilized by seven of the participants. The strategies of getting buy-in, embracing clarity, and sustaining emotional positivity were utilized by six of the participants. The utilization of the strategy of teaching positive social and emotional responses was demonstrated by one participant. Post-Intervention Journal Reflections The data from the participants’ post-intervention journal reflections indicated three emerging themes about the development of positive teacher-student relationships in a distance learning environment. The themes included the value of relationship building, the impact of developing relationships in a distance learning environment, and the participants’ perception of their growth. Student Teachers 1 and 7 reflected on the value of relationship-building in a distance learning environment. Student Teacher 1 said: I began the semester scared and stressed out. I was excited to be teaching, but angry about not being physically in the classroom. As the semester went on, I began to adjust to virtual teaching. I started developing positive relationships with my students and I got the proper technology to make the lessons go smoothly. This made everything so much easier and made teaching online enjoyable. Student Teacher 7 explained: My most treasured take-away from this experience was the relationships I developed with my students. I always knew building relationships was important, but it wasn’t until I observed my mentor teacher, that I could really see how important. Building relationships with your students, parents, and other staff members will help you to have a successful school year. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 87 Student Teachers 3, 4, and 6 reflected on their perceptions of their growth and confidence while building relationships with students in a distance learning environment. Student Teacher 3 shared: When it comes to building relationships with students, it was hard to navigate while being in a virtual environment. However, incorporating social-emotional components of learning into the virtual classroom, I started to gain the trust of the students. It was nice to take a break from teaching material and get to know my students, and for them to get to know one another. If nothing else, this pandemic has given me new tools to use in my classroom to touch on emotions and teach the students how to be social with each other. Student Teacher 4 stated: This entire experience from beginning to end was more than I could have ever imagined. Despite the constant changes with technology while teaching online, I learned so much not only about being a teacher but also about myself. I feel as though I have really come into my own as a teacher. I worked hard to get to know my students and to have them get to know me. I have built great relationships with them. I have also found my teacher voice and management style. Student Teacher 6 said: Building relationships with my students showed them that I am there for them academically and emotionally. This semester, my students opened up to me about their interests, struggles, and goals. This helped to build trust between myself and them. It also showed them that I cared. I now have more confidence in myself and the content that I am teaching. I am so thankful to have had the opportunity to DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 88 teach virtually because it has helped me to strengthen my technological skills and introduced me to resources I can use if I have to teach online in the future. Student Teachers 2, 5, and 8 discussed the impact that developing relationships in a distance learning environment had on their skills as future teachers. Student Teacher 2 stated: I’ve noticed a wonderful improvement in student engagement when I infuse my personality into instruction. Stronger relationships with the students are formed and the students excel academically. This will be important to remember when I have my own class of students. Student Teachers 5 and 8 also shared how their perspectives changed. Student Teacher 5 said: I was very skeptical that anyone could effectively build relationships with students online. I couldn’t imagine how teachers would be able to build relationships while engaging students, delivering instruction, and assessing their learning. My perspective has definitely changed. I found building relationships with students to be easier than I thought. The key in my opinion is to take advantage of every opportunity to interact with the students and get to know them as individuals. Student Teacher 8 explained: I am proud of the relationship I built with my students. When I first started working with the students, I was so focused on academics, I forgot to build relationships. I learned that building relationships with students helps your lessons to be more successful and the students are more receptive to learning from you. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 89 The teacher has to know the students both academically and personally. Academically, the teacher has to know what scaffolding and supports to provide for the students to succeed in the classroom. However, the teacher also needs to be able to make personal connections with the students. It’s hard to personal connections if there’s no trusting relationship between the teacher and the students. Perception Changes from Pre-Intervention to Post-Intervention The overall changes in the participants’ perceptions from the pre-intervention to post-intervention were reported as Confident (being rated as highly or somewhat confident) or Not Confident (being rated as highly unconfident or somewhat unconfident). Table 10 provides a summary of the participants’ self-ratings of their confidence in their ability to develop positive relationships with students within a distance learning environment at the beginning of the study and at the end of the study. The data indicates the participants’ growth in confidence in their ability to develop positive relationships in a distance learning environment. At the beginning of the study, one participant self-reported having confidence in her ability to develop positive relationships in a distance learning environment. One participant self-reported little confidence, and six participants self-reported having no confidence in their ability. By the conclusion of the study, all eight participants self-reported being confident. Four selfreported having high confidence and four self-reporting having high confidence. None of the participants self-reported a lack of confidence in their ability to develop positive teacher-student relationships in a distance learning environment. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 90 Table 10 Level of Confidence Change Before and After Intervention Confidence level Pre-intervention Post-intervention n=8 n=8 Highly confident - 4 Confident 1 4 A little confident 1 - Not confident 6 - The researcher reported the overall changes in the participants’ observed use of strategies to build positive teacher-student relationships from the pre-intervention to postintervention by indicating the number of participants observed utilizing the strategies with students at the beginning of the study as compared to during the intervention and after the end of the study. The data provided in Table 11 shows the growth in the participants’ use of strategies. The data collected during observation one indicated that the participants implemented four of the nine strategies. The data collected for observation two indicated that the participants implemented seven of the nine strategies. The data collected for observation three indicated that the participants implemented eight of the nine strategies. The majority of the participants did not demonstrate the use of five of the strategies during observation one and two of the strategies during observation two. During observation three, the majority of the participants did not demonstrate the use of one of the nine strategies. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Table 11 Strategy Use Before, During, and After Intervention Strategy and actions Observation 1 Observation 2 Observation 3 Positive Attitude Use affirmations Employ small engagers Give yourself permission to make mistakes 8/8 7/8 8/8 Encourage Interactions Share about yourself Respect students Incorporate interactive language 4/8 5/8 8/8 Get Buy-in Accentuate student interests Offer an incentive Pique students’ curiosity 2/8 6/8 6/8 Embrace Clarity Use fewer words Frame directions positively Give clear, simple directions 4/8 4/8 6/8 Show Passion Stay active Vary voice intentionally Keep eyes focused on students Focus on what you want to happen 6/8 6/8 8/8 Manage Mind-Body States Reduce lecture time. Eliminate the “fight, flight, or freeze” response Give students more control Ask compelling questions Keep students in suspense 0/8 4/8 6/8 Establish a Classroom Community Form cooperative groups Get to know you activities Help students gain social status 8/8 8/8 8/8 91 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING Observation 1 Observation 2 Observation 3 Sustain Emotional Positivity Use emotional punctuation. Provide positive classroom responses Accentuate the positive Use variety in your celebrations 4/8 7/8 7/8 Teach Positive Social and Emotional Responses Model appropriate responses Teach responses with fun activities 7/8 7/8 1/8 Strategy and Actions 92 Discussion The researcher designed the study to incorporate the use of a variety of data sources to support each research question and to triangulate the data for the purpose of increasing the credibility and validity of the study. The data analysis process, interviews, lesson observations, and participant journal reflections provided the researcher with answers to the research questions from different perspectives. In addition to the data providing answers to the research questions, it also identifies the need to analyze the preparatory training for preservice teachers. If the data are accurate, the researcher would anticipate that the preservice teachers will demonstrate the confidence and relationshipbuilding strategies needed to develop and maintain a positive teacher-student relationship with students during distance learning in the future. Summary The data collected answered the research questions posed in the study, including the ability of the preservice teachers to incorporate strategies to develop positive teacher and student relationships, identify indicators of an emerging positive teacher-student relationship, and the impact of distance learning on positive relationships. The data also DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 93 indicates the effectiveness of the applied intervention using a book study, facilitated discussions, and modeling and applying the use of relationship-building strategies. As a result of the intervention, the participants learned methods for developing positive teacher-student relationships and demonstrated growth in their confidence and use of the strategies when providing instruction in a distance learning environment. Chapter V will further discuss the data conclusions and implications. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 94 CHAPTER V Conclusions and Recommendations This action research study was conducted with the intent of improving the ability of preservice teachers to develop supportive relationships with students during distance learning. This chapter will provide an overview of the study results in relation to the research questions and the data collected. There will also be a discussion on the limitations of the study, the future implications for teacher preparation programs, and recommendations for future research. The results of this study are needed to enhance the current instructional programming for teacher preparation programs as K-12 schools provide instruction through both hybrid and distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions In an effort to answer the research study questions, the researcher implemented a mixed-methods process of data collection to identify the participants’ perceptions of the importance of relationship-building with students during distance learning. Components related to the participants’ opinions, application, and growth in building relationships with students were examined. The conclusions of the study were determined based on the data collected and framed to address the research questions. Research Question 1 How do preservice teachers perceive the importance of relationship-building strategies when delivering instruction in a distance learning environment? The data suggest that preservice teachers were able to identify the critical role DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 95 of the teacher for the development of positive teacher-student relationships. This finding was based on observational data on the specific strategies preservice teachers implemented when delivering instruction in a distance learning environment. All participants commented on the importance of having a supportive classroom environment and establishing positive relationships with students. They shared how positive relationships can be created by having conversations with students and demonstrating a willingness to listen. The participants also expressed their understanding that positive teacher-student relationships have a long-term impact on the students’ enjoyment of school and excitement for learning. In addition to understanding the importance of positive teacher-student relationships, the participants noted the development of positive relationships as the main responsibility of the teacher. The participant’s perception of the importance of having a positive relationship with students was confirmed by their comments about the impact on the classroom when a positive environment and connections are not present. Before the application of the intervention, only half of the participants felt confident in their ability to develop positive relationships with students. The participants’ confidence levels were based on their prior experience interacting and making connections with students. The participants who did not feel confident in developing positive relationships with students commented on their lack of experience in knowing how to get students to talk and share their thoughts. The lack of confidence could also be attributed to the participants’ lack of experience in an urban school setting and the differences between the teacher and student demographics. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 96 When the participants self-reported their confidence in their ability to develop positive relationships with students when providing instruction in a distance learning environment, the data showed that the majority of the preservice teachers felt little to no confidence. Their lack of confidence in developing positive relationships with students during online instruction was due to their discomfort with technology and their lack of experience observing how teachers learn about student interests and connect with them while teaching online. The participants who expressed feelings of confidence in their ability to develop positive teacher-student relationships during distance learning commented on having more experiences with children and being comfortable using technology. At the beginning of the study, the participants expressed feeling anxious and concerned about developing positive teacher-student relationships. By the end of the study, those feelings changed as the participants observed their mentor teachers model how to create positive relationships with students and the emerging classroom culture. The participants were observed taking the time to get to know the students as individuals, sharing about themselves, scaffolding instruction and supports, infusing their personality into their teaching, and making connections with the students. The participants also identified a change in their perception of their ability to foster positive teacher-student relationships and their knowledge of the effective use of technology to foster positive teacher-student relationships. After the study, the participants indicated that teaching in a distance learning environment became more manageable and enjoyable. The participants were asked to rank their confidence in developing positive relationships with students in a distance learning environment after the application of the DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 97 intervention. The data further supported a change in the participants’ confidence in developing positive relationships in a distance learning environment. While six of the participants felt little to no confidence developing positive student-teacher relationships in a distance learning environment at the beginning of the study, after the intervention was applied, all the participants ranked themselves as being confident or highly confident in their ability. Research Question 2 What do preservice teachers perceive as indicators of emerging positive teacher-student relationships during distance learning? The participants identified both verbal and non-verbal indicators of positive teacher-student relationships emerging within the distance learning environment. The indicators included an increase in interactive dialogue as the students began to acknowledge the preservice teacher by greeting them at the beginning and end of the class session. The preservice teachers shared how they could see the students smiling, laughing, and making facial expressions in response to class discussions and interactions. The participants also indicated that the students began to share commonalities with the preservice teacher and the other students in the class as they made personal connections and learned more about each other. The participants identified another indicator of the emerging positive relationships occurred when the students became more vocal and willing to engage in conversations and share their work. The study participants also shared strategies they observed or used during the application of the intervention to encourage positive teacher-student relationships during distance learning. The strategies included making personal connections and positive DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 98 comments to the students, providing time before and after class for students to interact with the mentor and preservice teacher. Other strategies implemented included providing time for discussions during morning meetings, allowing students to interact with each other, and using humor to alleviate stressful situations. After the application of the intervention, the participants identified additional indicators of the positive relationships that had emerged within the distance learning environment. The majority of the participants shared how the students started coming to class early and staying later to talk and share important items from home. The participants indicated that the students also became more comfortable sharing their thoughts and needs. For example, the students started to express when they needed a brain break, or when they were confused or thought the work was too easy. The students’ positive attitude and encouragement of one another were also noted by the preservice teachers. Research Question 3 Does distance learning impact the development of positive classroom relationships between the preservice teacher and students? The data indicated that the participants demonstrated the ability to develop positive classroom environment and relationship with students in the distance learning environment. Prior to learning the strategies for building positive teacher-student relationships, the participants implemented three of the nine strategies relationshipbuilding strategies. These strategies included showing passion, establishing a classroom community, and teaching positive social and emotional responses. The participants DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 99 demonstrated these strategies as they taught the expected classroom behaviors and modeled appropriate interactions. The book study and discussion provided during the intervention played a significant role in the participants’ knowledge and application of the relationship-building strategies. During the intervention phase, the participants were taught the nine strategies for building positive teacher-student relationships. They learned the components of each strategy and how the strategies could be applied across grade levels. The participants engaged in professional learning discussions on how to incorporate the strategies within their classroom instruction. The strategy discussions were interactive, with the participants sharing their understanding of the importance of the strategies and suggestions for how to effectively incorporate the strategies into their lessons. The participants also became a community of learners during the intervention phase, where they discussed adaptations to the strategies that they could make based on their grade level and the instructional level of the students in their class. The evidence of the application of the strategies was demonstrated in the participants’ lesson plans, where they documented the strategy they planned to implement. By incorporating the strategy into the instructional plans, the participants were deliberate in their application of the strategies, as evidenced in the lesson observation. During lesson observations, the participants consistently implemented six of the nine relationship-building strategies. In addition to the strategies observed prior to the intervention, the participants were incorporating the use of the strategies of modeling a positive attitude, getting buy-in, and sustaining emotional positivity. These strategies were observed as the participants interacted with students and taught lessons. By the end 100 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING of the study, the participants were observed consistently implementing eight of the nine strategies, including modeling a positive attitude, encouraging interactions, getting buyin, embracing clarity, showing passion, managing mind-body states, establishing a classroom community, and sustaining emotional positivity. At the end of the study, the only strategy not utilized by the participants was teaching positive social and emotional responses. While the strategy was not observed during the final classroom observations, the effect of the strategy was observed in the interactions between the preservice teachers and the students, indicating that the strategy had been established. The strategy was observed being utilized by one participant as she reviewed the classroom procedures for two students who were new to her classroom. In several instances, the preservice teacher’s confidence in establishing positive relationships with students while teaching in a distance learning environment changed. The participants went from lacking the confidence to develop positive relationships to having a high level of confidence in their ability. After the participants built connections with the students and became more comfortable using technology to engage with them, their confidence grew. The preservice teachers’ use of relationship-building strategies also increased throughout the study. At the beginning of the study, three of the nine strategies for relationship building were implemented during non-instructional segments of the school day. However, as the preservice teachers became responsible for planning and delivering content, their strategy use was adjusted to support and enhance the academic rigor of the classroom. By the end of the study, the participants had implemented all nine of the strategies for relationship building to communicate classroom expectations, model DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 101 appropriate behaviors, engage students in instruction, and establish a positive and respectful classroom environment. This resulted in a shift in the participants’ perception of the need for a positive classroom environment. The participants shifted from a basic desire for students to be happy and like being at school, to a deeper appreciation for classroom engagement and positive interactions between the teacher and students. Overall, the researcher determined that the study had a positive effect on the participants’ understanding of the need for relationship building, the use of specific strategies to build positive classroom relationships, and their confidence in applying the strategies in a distance learning environment. Application for Teacher Preparation Programs The conclusions drawn from this action-research study have practical applications for teacher preparation programs. The positive outcome of the study justifies the continued use of the professional development resources and interventions implemented during the student teaching field experience with future preservice teachers. However, the application of the intervention with future preservice teachers should include adaptations to support instruction provided during both in-person and distance learning instruction and include professional development offerings related to relationship-building strategies for targeted student groups. These offerings should address incorporating the relationship-building strategies with students with specific social, emotional, and language needs, including learning support students and English language learners in a variety of instructional settings, including in-person, distance, and hybrid instruction. Curricular considerations for teacher preparation programs should include instruction on effective technology tools to engage students during distance learning. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 102 Technology usage should also be integrated into the teacher preparation courses to provide preservice teachers with ongoing instruction, modeling, and application of technology within the instructional setting to enhance student engagement and instruction. Fiscal Implications The implementation cost for this study included mentor teacher stipends and professional development text for the preservice teachers. Future studies should factor in additional targeted professional development resources and technology access for preservice teachers. Professional development resources should focus on teaching additional strategies for relationship-building and best practices for creating a supportive classroom environment for targeted student populations, including learning support students, English language learners, and students of poverty. Enhanced technology offerings should include access to technology devices, high-speed internet, and digital learning tools and applications that can be used in a distance learning field experience. Limitations This study yielded important information pertaining to the need for teacherstudent relationships, the indicators of emerging positive classroom culture, and the ability to establish positive relationships while teaching in a distance learning environment. However, the study findings may have some limitations due to the impact of the following external factors. First, the researcher had limited access to unscheduled instructional sessions to gather data. The observational data were collected during scheduled lessons. As a result, the researcher was unable to observe the informal interactions between the preservice teachers and students during the non-instructional DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 103 times. The ability to observe the preservice teachers during the non-instructional times would have enabled the researcher to monitor both the development of the relationships between the preservice teachers and the students and their interactions in a natural setting. All preservice teachers in the cohort received the intervention; however, data was only collected on eight of the sixteen preservice teachers in the cohort. Because all cohort members received the intervention and discussed applications of the strategies in both formal and informal settings, results reported here cannot rule out the influence of cohort interactions outside of the study as a confounding variable. This limits the ability to confidently state that participant growth was strictly a result of the intervention. Another factor that may have impacted the findings of the study was the timing of the mandate from the State and local school district that all instruction be delivered online in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This mandate was communicated during the summer, before the start of the school year. Due to the timing, the preservice teachers felt unprepared to provide distance instruction. This created uncertainty and confusion for the mentor and preservice teachers. As a result, some study participants experienced stress and anxiety at the beginning of the study, which may have impacted their initial self-reporting of their confidence to develop positive relationships when teaching in a distance learning environment. The lack of flexibility in determining the use of instructional time was another factor that may have impacted the findings of the study. The participating school district determined the mode of instruction and the teaching schedule for the classes. The preservice teachers and the mentor teachers were not permitted to make modifications to the allocation and structure of the instructional time. This may have impacted the DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 104 preservice teachers’ ability to provide additional time to facilitate rapport activities, respond to the social-emotional needs of the students, and may have limited the specific relationship-building strategies that were implemented. The participants’ access to technology resources and tools was another limitation of the study. The participants were required to provide their own technology devices, including laptop computers and high-speed internet connection. Some participant devices were unstable, which caused them to lose the internet connection, video, or sound during the instructional sessions. At the beginning of the study, the participants worked through a variety of technical issues that may have influenced their initial self-assessment of their confidence in teaching in a distance learning environment. It is important to note that this factor was addressed when the participants were offered an internet hotspot to ensure access to a high-speed internet connection. It is also important to note that this study was conducted with White preservice teachers in an urban school setting, limiting generalizability to other populations and settings. Recommendations for Future Research Through this action research project, the researcher collected valuable data on the development of positive teacher-student relationships in a distance learning environment by observing preservice teachers’ use of relationship-building strategies (Appendix E). The data collected can be used to inform professional development topics for school districts and course offerings for teacher preparation programs. Data gathered through the use of the observation rubric showed that positive teacher-student relationships were achieved by implementing the relationship-building DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 105 strategies within the distance learning classroom setting with this population. As such, future research should investigate the effectiveness to other populations and in other setting. When full in-person instruction returns, the goal should be to transfer the skills learned from distance learning, into the classroom setting. Future research should investigate the maintenance of relationship-building strategies after resuming face-to-face instruction to determine if the strategies are sustained over time and successfully transferred from the distance learning environment into the in-person classroom setting. Future research should also investigate if the preservice teachers can self-sustain their use of the relationship-building strategies by utilizing the observation rubric for planning, self-reflection and monitoring. During the pre-intervention and post-intervention interviews, the preservice teachers identified the ability to meet the needs of learning support and English language learners during distance learning, as an area of concern. Future research should be conducted to examine the impact of the development of teacher-student relationships on student academic growth, SEL learning, and how diversity, poverty, and ELL status impacts that growth. Exploring strategies for relationship building for these student populations will provide school districts and teacher preparation programs with valuable information to inform teacher practice and improve student growth and achievement. The findings from this study related to relationship-building at the elementary level during distance learning should be applied to other instructional levels in the K-12 setting. Future research should explore the use of relationship-building strategies within a distance learning environment at the middle or high school level, the training needed for teachers, and the impact on the overall growth and achievement of students. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 106 Summary This research study provides compelling evidence to support the notion that focused instruction on relationship-building strategies improves the confidence and ability of preservice teachers to develop and maintain positive relationships within a distance learning classroom environment. As the mode of instruction within the public school setting has become multi-faceted to include in-person instruction, distance learning, or a hybrid of both, the ability to develop positive relationships with students is needed now more than ever. It is imperative that preservice teachers have the knowledge and training to develop positive relationships with students in multiple and varied instructional settings. While this study was specific to the preservice teachers who participated in the study, teacher preparation courses and school districts may benefit from the data collected, observation form, and semi-structured interview questions to improve or implement their professional development plan. This study makes a significant contribution to the body of literature related to the development of positive teacher-student relationships in the distance learning school environment and serves as a catalyst for future research. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 107 References Administration for Children and Families. (2010, January). Head Start impact study: Final report. Department of Health and Human Services. Ahmad, S., Hussain, A., Ayub, A., Zaheer, M., & Batool, A. (2017). Relationship of classroom management strategies with academic performance of students at college level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(2), 239–249. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Erlbaum. Anderson, C. S. (1982). The search for school climate: A review of the research. Review of the Educational Research, 52(3), 368–420. Ang, S., & Dyne L. V. (2008). Handbook on Cultural Intelligence: Theory, measurement and applications. Routledge. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 427-445. Avery, P. G., & Walker, C. (1993). Prospective teachers perceptions of ethnic and gender differences in academic achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 44 (1), 2737. Baker, J. A., Terry, T., Bridger, R., & Winsor, A. (1997). Schools as caring communities: A relational approach to school reform. School Psychology Review, 26(4), 586602. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 108 Barak, M., & Rafaeli, S. (2004). On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 61(1), 84-103. Barbour, M. K. (2016). Virtual education: Not yet ready for prime time? In W. J. Mathis & T. Trujillo (Eds.), The test-based education reforms: Lessons from a failed agenda (pp. 407-429). Information Age Publishing. Baskin, T. W., Wampold, B. E., Quintana, S. M., & Enright, R. D. (2010). Belongingness as a protective factor against loneliness and potential depression in a multicultural middle school. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(5), 626-651. Bartolomé, L. I. (2002). Creating an equal playing field: Teachers as advocates, bordercrossers, and cultural brokers. In Z. F. Beyknot (Ed.), The power of culture: Teaching across language difference (pp. 167-191). Harvard Educational Publishing Group. Bernard, B. (1991). Fostering resiliency in kids: Protective factors in the family, school, and community. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439. Berry, B. (2001). No shortcuts to preparing good teachers. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 32-36. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 109 Bollin, G. G. (2007). Preparing teachers for Hispanic immigrant children: A service learning approach. Journal of Latinos & Education, 6(2), 177-189. Booker, C. K. (2004). Exploring school belonging and academic achievement in African American adolescents. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 6, 131–143. Brock, L. L., Nishida, T. K., Chiong, C., Grimm, K. J., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2008). Children's perceptions of the classroom environment and social and academic performance: A longitudinal analysis of the contribution of the responsive classroom approach. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 129-149. Brown, T. M., Clark, S. R., & Bridges, T. L. (2012). Youth teaching teachers: Bridging racial and cultural divides between teachers and students. In S. Hughes & T. Berry (Eds.), The evolving significance of race: Living, learning, and teaching (pp. 69-82). Peter Lang. Brown, T. M., & Rodríguez, L. F. (2009). School and the co-construction of dropout. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(2), 221-242. Bryant, L. C., Moss, G., & Boudreau, A. Z. (2015). Race dialogues in teacher preparation: Beginning the conversation. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 6(2), 43-59. Byrd, C. M. (2016). Does culturally relevant teaching work? An examination from student perspectives. SAGE Open, 6(3), 1-10. Catalano, R. F., Oesterle, S., Fleming, C. B., & Hawkins, D. (2004). The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: Findings from the social development research group. Journal of School Health, 74, 252–261. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 110 Cavanaugh, C. S., Barbour, M. K., & Clark, T. (2009). Research and practice in K-12 online learning: A review of open access literature. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(1), 1-22. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse the language of teaching and learning. Heinemann. Cemalcilar, Z. (2010). Schools as socialization contexts: Understanding the impact of school climate factors on students’ sense of school belonging. Applied Psychology, 59, 243–272. Chen, Y., Chen, N.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2009). The use of online synchronous discussion for web-based professional development for teachers. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1155-1166. Cochran-Smith, M. (1995, January). Color blindness and basket making are not the answers: Confronting the dilemmas of race, culture, and language diversity in teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 493-522. Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006, July). Semi-structured interviews. Qualitative Research Guidelines Project. http://www.qualres.org/HomeSemi-3629.html. Corso, M. J., Bundick, M. J., Quaglia, R., & Haywood, D. E. (2013). Where student, teacher, and content meet: Student engagement in the secondary school classroom. American Secondary Education, 41, 50–61. Curwin, R. L., Mendler, A. N., & Mendler, B. D. (2018). Discipline with dignity: How to build responsibility, relationships, and respect in your classroom. ASCD. Cushner, K., McClelland, A., & Safford, P. (1996). Human diversity in education: An integrative approach. (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 111 Cyrs, T., & Conway, E. (2000). Teaching at a distance with the emerging technologies: An instructional systems approach. Phillips Brothers. Darling-Hammond, L. French, J., & Garcia-Lopez, S. P. (2002). Learning to teach for social justice. Teachers College Press. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum. Delpit, L. D. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom (2nd ed.). New Press. Demmans Epp, C., Phirangee, K., & Hewitt, J. (2017). Student actions and community in online courses: The roles played by course length and facilitation method. Online Learning, 21(4), 53-77. doi:10.24059/olj.v21i4.1269 DiPietro, M., Ferdig, R. E., Black, E. W., & Preston, M. (2008). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan virtual school teachers. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1), 10-35. Downer, J. T., Sabol, T. J., & Hamre, B. K. (2010). Teacher–child interactions in the classroom: Toward a theory of within- and cross-domain links to children’s developmental outcomes. Early Education and Development, 21(5), 699–732. Duncan-Andrade, J. (2005). Developing social justice educators. Educational Leadership, 62(6), 70-73. Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324-340. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 112 Earley, P. C., & Ang. S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford University Press. Eisele, H., & Thomson, N. R. (2009). The role of sex, self-perception, and school bonding in predicting academic achievement among middle class African American early adolescents. Adolescence, 44(176), 773–796. Elias, M. J., & Schwab, Y. (2006). From compliance to responsibility: Social and emotional learning and classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 309-341). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Faircloth, B. S., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). The dynamic reality of adolescent peer networks and sense of belonging. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57(1), 48-72. Ferdig, R. E., Cavanaugh, C., Dipietro, M., Black, E. W., & Dawson, K. (2009). Virtual schooling standards and best practices for teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 203-226. Fine, M. (1986). Why urban adolescents drop into and out of public high school. Teachers College Record, 87, 393-409. Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1991). Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences. Pergamon. Frydenberg, E., Care, E., Freeman, E., & Chan, E. (2009). Interrelationships between coping, school connectedness and wellbeing. Australian Journal of Education, 5, 261–276. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 113 Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148162. Garrison, D. R. (2010). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 5-9. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106-116. Giani, M., & O’Guinn, C. (2010). Motivation to learn: Igniting a love of learning in all students. John W. Garder Center at Stanford University. https://studylib.net/doc/7444864/motivation-to-learn--igniting-a-love-of-learningin-all-s... Goldstein, L. S., & Freedman, D. (2003). Challenges enacting caring teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 441-454. Goldstein, L. S., & Lake, V. E. (2000). “Love, love and more love for children”: Exploring preservice teachers’ understandings of caring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 861-872. Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21-43. Goodenow, C., & Grady, K. E. (1992). The relationship of school belonging and DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 114 friends' values to academic motivation among urban adolescent students. Journal of Experimental Education, 62(1), 60-71. Gorski, P. C. (2012). Instructional, institutional, and sociopolitical challenges of teaching multicultural teacher education courses. The Teacher Educator, 47, 216-235. Haberman, M. (2004). The pedagogy of poverty. Kappa Delta Pi. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625-638. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the firstgrade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Society for Research in Child Development, 76, 949-967. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge. Hawkins, A., Graham, C. R., & Barbour, M. K. (2012). Everybody is their own island: Teacher disconnection in a virtual school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2), 123-144. Hawkins, A., Graham, C. R., Sudweeks, R. R., & Barbour, M. K. (2013). Academic performance course completion rates, and student perception of the quality and frequency of interaction in a virtual high school. Distance Education, 34(1), 6483. Hendricks, C. (2017). Improving schools through action research: A reflective practice approach. Pearson. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 115 Hilliard, A. G., III. (1995). Mathematics excellence for cultural “minority” students: What is the problem? In I. M. Carl (Ed.), Prospects for school mathematics (pp. 99- 114). The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. Hillman, D., Willis, D., & Gunawardena, C. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30-41. Hittie, M. (2000, June 26). Building community in the classroom [Conference Presentation]. International Education Summit, Detroit, MI. http://www.wholeschooling.net/WS/WSPress/CommBldgMH.pdf Hossein, M., Asadzadeh, H., Shabani, H., Ahghar, G., Ahadi, H., & Shamir, A. S. (2011). The role of invitational education and intelligence beliefs in academic performance. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 17, 3-10. Howard, T. C., & Milner, H. R. (2014). Teacher preparation for urban schools. In H. R. Milner & K. Lomotey (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 199-216). Routledge. Hughes, J. N., & Kwok, O. (2007). The influence of student–teacher and parent–teacher relationships on lower achieving readers’ engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 39–51. Hughes, J., Luo, W., Kwok, O., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 1-14. International Association for K-12 Online Learning. (2011). National Standards for Quality Online Teaching. Authors. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 116 http://www.inacol.org/cms/wpcontent/uploads/2013/02/iNACOL_TeachingStand ardsv2.pdf Irvine, J. J. (1992). Making teacher education culturally responsive. In M. Dilworth (Ed.), Diversity in teacher education (pp. 79-92). Jossey-Bass. Jackson, F.R. (1994). Seven strategies to support a culturally responsive pedagogy. Journal of Reading, 37(4), 298-303. Jensen, E. (2010). Teaching with poverty in mind: What being poor does to kids' brains and what schools can do about it. ASCD. Jensen, E. (2013). Engaging students with poverty in mind: Practical Strategies for raising achievement. ASCD Journell, W., Beeson, M. W., Crave, J. J., Gomez, M., Linton, J. N., & Taylor, M. O. (2013). Training teachers for virtual classrooms: A description of an experimental course in online pedagogy. In R. Hartshorne, T. L. Heafner, & T. M. Petty (Eds.), Teacher education programs and online learning tools: Innovations in teacher preparation (pp. 120-143). IGI Global. Karatas, K., & Oral, B. (2016). Culturally responsive pedagogy. The Journal of Academic Social Science (ASOS Journal), 4(34), 431-447. Ke, F., & Hoadley, C. (2009). Evaluating online learning communities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 487-510. Koslow, A., & Piña, A. A. (2015). Using transactional distance theory to inform online instructional design. Instructional Technology, 12(10), 63–72. Kunjufu, J. (2002). Black students, middle class teachers. African American Images. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 117 La Guardia, J. G., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). What adolescents need: A self-determination theory perspective on development within families, school, and society. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (Vol. 2, pp. 193219). Information Age. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dream keepers: Successful teachers of African American children. Jossey-Bass. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Dream keepers: Successful teachers of African American children. Jossey-Bass. Lai, K. W. (2015). Knowledge construction in online learning communities: A case study of a doctoral course. Studies in Higher Education, 40(4), 561-579. Larson, A. (2006). Student perception of caring teaching in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 11, 337-352. Leblanc, A., & Lindgren, C. (2013, October 23-25). Development of online courses focusing on quality [Conference Presentation]. Proceedings - The Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference, Paris. Leedy P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2013). Practical research: Planning and design (10th ed.). Pearson. Loreman, T. (2011). Love as pedagogy. Sense Publishers. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield . Martin, J. H. (2017). Urban high school teachers’ perceptions of their preservice training in classroom management strategies (Publication No. 10257405) [Doctoral DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 118 dissertation, Grand Canyon University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1). Martin, O., & Williams-Dixon, R. (1994). Overcoming social distance barriers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 21(1), 76. Marzano, R., & Marzano, J. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 6–13. Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., Burchinal, M., Early, D. M., & Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732-749. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370396. Masten, A. S. (1994). Resilience in individual development: Successful adaptation despite risk and adversity. In M. C. Wang & E. W. Gordon (Eds.), Educational resilience in inner- city America: Challenges and prospects (pp. 3-26). Erlbaum. Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. American Psychologist, 53, 205-220. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 119 Mayes, R., Luebeck, J., Ku, H. Y., Akarasriworn, C., & Korkmaz, O. (2011). Themes and strategies for transformative online instruction: A review of literature and practice. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(3), 151-166. McDaniels, M., Pfund, C., & Barnicle, K. (2016). Creating dynamic learning communities in synchronous online courses: One approach from the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL). Online Learning, 20(1), 110-129. McIsaac, M. S., & Blocher, J.M. (1998). How research in distance education can affect practice. Educational Media International, 35(1), 43-47. Meeuwisse, M., Severiens, S. E., & Born, M. P. (2010). Learning environment, interaction, sense of belonging and study success in ethnically diverse student groups. Research in Higher Education, 51, 528-545. Meloro, P. C. (2005). Do high school advisory programs promote personalization? Correlates of school belonging [Doctoral dissertation, University of Rhode Island]. Proquest Dissertations & Theses Global. http://search.proquest.com/docview/305429656/624F2F01CAF04764PQ/4?accou ntid=15725 Mertler, C. A. (2019). Introduction to education research (2nd ed.). Sage. Miller, S., & Redman, S. (2010). Improving instructor presence in an online introductory astronomy course through video demonstrations. Astronomy Education Review, 9(1), 1–10. Milner, R. H. (2006). Preservice teachers’ learning about cultural and racial diversity: Implications for urban education. Urban Education, 41(4), 343-375. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 120 Moore, M. G. (1996). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). Routledge. Moore, M. (1992). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6. Murphy, M. C., & Zirkel, S. (2015). Race and belonging in school: How anticipated and experienced belonging affect choice, persistence, and performance. Teachers College Record, 117(12), 1-40. Murray, C., & Greenberg, M. K. (2000). Children’s relationship with teachers and bonds with school an investigation of patterns and correlates in middle childhood. Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 423–445. National Education Association. (2006). Guide to teaching online courses. http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/onlineteachguide.pdf National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network (NICHD ECCRN). (2002). The relation of global first-grade classroom environment to structural classroom features and teacher and student behaviors. Elementary School Journal, 102(5), 367–387. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network (NICHD ECCRN). (2003). Social functioning in first grade: Associations with earlier home and child care predictors and with current classroom experiences. Child Development, 74(6), 1639–1662. Nieto, S. (2000). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 121 Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. Teachers College Press. O’Connor, E. E., Dearing, E., & Collins, B. A. (2011). Teacher-child relationship and behavior problem trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 120–162. Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. The Civil Rights Project. http://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/deseg/Why_Segreg_Matters.pdf Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. Jossey-Bass. Parker, A. (1999). Interaction in distance education: The critical conversation. Educational Technology Review, Autumn/Winter(12), 13-17. Phirangee, K., Demmans Epp, C., & Hewitt, J. (2016b). Exploring the relationships between facilitation methods, students’ sense of community and their online behaviors. Online Learning Journal, 20(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.775 Pianta, R. C. (1992). The student-teacher relationship scale. University of Virginia. Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., Morrison, F. & The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.(NICHD) Early Child Care Research Network. (2008). Classroom effects on children’s achievement DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 122 trajectories in elementary school. American Education Research Journal, 49, 365397. Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). The classroom assessment scoring system (CLASS). Brookes Publishing. Pianta, R. C., LaParo, K. M., Payne, C., Cox, M. J., & Bradley, R. (2002). The relation of kindergarten classroom environment to teacher, family, and school characteristics and child outcomes. Elementary School Journal, 102, 225-238. Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. W. (2004). Teacher-child relationships and children’s success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 444-458. Pianta, R. C., & Walsh, D. J. (1996). High-risk children in schools: Constructing sustaining relationships. Routledge. Phuntsog, N. (1999). The magic of culturally responsive pedagogy: In search of the genie's lamp in multicultural education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 26(3), 97111 Redmond, P. (2011). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions. Ascilite 2011, Hobart Tasmania, Australia. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Redmondfull.pdf Rice, K. L. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the K-12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 425-448. Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Virtually successful: Defeating the dropout problem through online school programs. The Phi Delta Kappan, 88(1), 31-36. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 123 Rodríguez, L. F. (2012). Everybody grieves, but still nobody sees: Toward a praxis of recognition for Latina/o students in U.S. schools. Teachers College Record, 114(1), 1-31. Rodríguez, L. F. (2013). Moving beyond test-prep pedagogy: Dialoging with Multicultural preservice teachers for a quality education. Multicultural Perspectives, 15(3), 133-140.doi:10.1080/15210960.2013.809302 Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage. Rovai, A. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 1(1) 77-88. Ryabov, I., & Van Hook, J. (2007). School segregation and academic achievement among Hispanic children. Social Science Research, 36, 767–788. Saba, F., & Shearer, R. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36-59. Sapon-Shelvin, M. (2010). Because we can change the world: A practical guide to building cooperative, inclusive classroom communities. Corwin. Schussler, D. L., & Collins, A. (2006). An empirical exploration of the who, what, and how of school care. Teachers College Record, 108, 1460-1495. Shea, P., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175-190. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 124 Sheets, R. (1994). Student voice: Factors that cause teacher/student confrontations in a pluralistic classroom (ED371089). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED371089.pdf Sheets, R. H., & Gay, G. (1996, May). Student perceptions of disciplinary conflict in ethnically diverse classrooms. NASSP Bulletin, 84-93. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1). http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm Silver, R. B., Measelle, J. R., Armstrong, J. M., & Essex, M. J. (2005). Trajectories of classroom externalizing behavior: Contributions of child characteristics, family characteristics, and the teacher–child relationship during the school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 43(1), 39–60. Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Connell, J. P. (1998). Individual differences in the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(2). Soodak, L. C. (2003). Classroom management in inclusive classrooms. Theory into Practice, 42(4), 327-333. Soodak, L. C., & McCharty, M. R. (2006). Classroom management in inclusive classrooms. In C. M. Evertson & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues (pp. 461-489). Lawrence Erlbaum. Spitzer, D.R. (1998). Rediscovering the social context of distance learning. Educational Technology, 38(2), 52-56. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 125 Stockard, J., & Mayberry, M. (1992). Effective educational environments. Corwin. Tatum, B. (2007). Can we talk about race?: And other conversations in an era of school re-segregation. Beacon Press. Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. (1997). The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 85-115. Tosolt, B. (2010). Gender and race differences in middle school students’ perceptions of caring teacher behaviors. Multicultural Perspectives, 12, 145–151. Tomey-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H„ & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Delft, Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1973). Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 93-102. Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Record, 106, 1759-1785. Underdown, K., & Martin, J. (2016). Engaging the online student: Instructor-created video content for the online classroom. Journal of Instructional Research, 5, 8-12. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80-91. Vitto, J.M. (2003). Relationship-driven classroom management: Strategies that promote student motivation. Corwin Press. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 126 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Wagner, E. (1997). Interactivity: From agents to outcomes. In T. Cyrs (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning (Vol. 71, pp. 19-25). Jossey-Bass. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 30-43. Waxman, H. C., Huang, S. L., Anderson, L., & Weinstein, T. (1997). Classroom process differences in inner-city elementary schools. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 49-59. Waycott, J., Sheard, J., Thompson, C., & Clerehan, R. (2013). Making students’ work visible on the social web: A blessing or a curse? Computers & Education, 68, 8695. Wentzel, K. R. (1994). Relations of social goal pursuit to social acceptance, classroom behavior, and perceived social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 173-182. Wentzel, K. R. (1999). What is it that I’m trying to achieve? Classroom goals from a content perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 105–115. Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73(1), 287–301. Williams, R. (1971). Relationship of class participation to personality, ability, and achievement variables. The Journal of Social Psychology, 83(2), 193-198. Williams, S. V. (2013). Outsider teacher/insider knowledge: Fostering Mohawk cultural competency for non-native teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 40(1), 25-43. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 127 Wilson, L. (2014). Partnerships: Families and communities in early childhood. Nelson. Wolcott, L. L. (1996). Distant, but not distanced: a learner-centered approach to distance education. Tech Trends, 41(5), 23-27. Wright, S. P., Horn, S.P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997) Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67. Zeichner, K., & Gore, J. (1990). Teacher socialization. In R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 329-348). Macmillan. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING APPENDICES 128 DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 129 Appendix A IRB Approval Institutional Review Board California University of Pennsylvania Morgan Hall, 310 250 University Avenue California, PA 15419 instreviewboard@calu.edu Melissa Sovak, Ph.D. Dear Lynette, Please consider this email as official notification that your proposal titled “Creating a Supportive Classroom Environment” (Proposal #19-084) has been approved by the California University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board as submitted. The effective date of approval is 9/16/20 and the expiration date is 9/15/21. These dates must appear on the consent form. Please note that Federal Policy requires that you notify the IRB promptly regarding any of the following: (1) Any additions or changes in procedures you might wish for your study (additions or changes must be approved by the IRB before they are implemented) (2) Any events that affect the safety or well-being of subjects (3) Any modifications of your study or other responses that are necessitated by any events reported in (2). (4) To continue your research beyond the approval expiration date of 9/15/21 you must file additional information to be considered for continuing review. Please contact instreviewboard@calu.edu Please notify the Board when data collection is complete. Regards, Melissa Sovak, PhD. Chair, Institutional Review Board DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 130 Appendix B Participant Informed Consent Form Dear Preservice Teacher, You are being asked to participate in a research study on the perceptions of preservice teachers regarding the skills necessary to establish, develop and maintain positive relationships through a welcoming classroom environment in a distance learning environment. Your participation in this study will help the researcher learn more about the instructional practices that support the development of positive student and teacher relationships, the extent to which preservice teachers naturally incorporate these practices into their delivery of instruction, and their ability to recognize when adjustments need to be made to maintain a positive student and teacher relationship. What will I be asked to do if I take part in this study? If you agree to participate in this study, you will be asked to participate in two study interviews (pre- and post-). The pre- and post-study interviews will ask you questions about your background and experience with building positive student and teacher relationships in the elementary school setting. Where will this study take place? The pre- and post- study Interviews will occur using an online platform (Zoom). How long will the study last? The study is projected to last approximately 16 weeks, which includes a pre- and postinterviews, and observations. The pre- and post-interviews may take up to 30 minutes each or 60 minutes total to complete. Total participation time will vary. What happens if I don’t want to participate? Participation in this study is completely voluntary. You have the right to say no. Participation in this study will not affect you in any way. If you decide to participate in the study, you may change your mind at any time and withdraw. There are no consequences to you for withdrawing from the study. Can I quit the study before it ends? You can withdraw from the study at any time by notifying the researcher. There will be no penalty should you choose to withdraw. The researcher will not ask you why you opted to withdraw. What are the risks? There are minimal risks to participants of this study. Participants will not be asked any demographic questions or questions of a sensitive nature. The interview questions, observations, and self-reflections will be used to gauge your experiential growth during the study. Participants may choose not to answer any questions of which they choose. Participants may also choose end their participation in the study at any time without question. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 131 How will I benefit from participating? Your participation in the this study will assist the researcher in understanding the instructional practices that support the development of positive student and teacher relationships in a distance learning environment, the extent to which preservice teachers naturally incorporate these practices into their delivery of instruction, and the strategies utilized to maintain a positive student and teacher relationship. As a result, you will gain experience in establishing, developing and maintaining positive relationships with your students and how to create a classroom environment where students feel a sense of belonging and connectedness. Will my responses be kept confidential and private? The interview responses and data collected will be kept confidential. Only the researcher will see or have access to the data. No names will be reported in the report of the findings. All data will be stored on a secure server and password-protected laptop. Who do I contact if I have questions about this study? If you have questions about this study, please contact the researcher, Lynette Waller, at wal2687@calu.edu or at 717-381-1023. If you would like to speak with someone other than the researcher, please contact Dr. Mary Wolf, Assistant Professor at California University of Pennsylvania, at wolf@calu.edu. By signing below, I agree to participate in this study. By doing so, I am indicating that 1) I am at least 18 years old; 2) I have read and understand the information given in this form; 3) I have asked any questions I have about the research and the questions have been answered to my satisfaction; and 4) I accept the terms in the form and volunteer to participate in the study. I understand that it is my choice to participate and I can stop at any time. Signature: ________________________________________________________________________ Date: ________________________________________________________________________ Approved by the California University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. This approval is effective 09/16/20 and expires 05/10/21. DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 132 Appendix C Pre-Intervention Interview Questions 1. Describe your classroom teaching experience prior to this school year and the populations with whom you have interacted in an elementary classroom environment? 2. Do you believe a positive classroom environment and creating warm relationships is important? If so, why? 3. How do think a positive classroom learning environment is created? Provide a working definition of teacher and student relationships prior to asking the remaining questions. 4. Please provide examples of positive teacher and student relationships you have observed in the elementary school setting. 5. What strategies have you observed teachers using when developing student to student and teacher to student relationships? 6. Did the strategies observed support the development of positive relationships? How do you know? On a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the highest): 7. How confident are you in your ability to develop a positive teacher-student relationships between yourself and the students in a distance learning environment? 8. How confident are you that you will develop positive teacher-student relationships in a distance learning environment? DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 133 Appendix D Post-Intervention Interview Questions 1. How is distance learning being delivered in your school setting? 2. Please describe the students in you class or instructional group? 3. Do you believe a positive classroom environment and creating warm relationships is important? If so, why? 4. How do think a positive classroom learning environment is created? Provide a working definition of teacher and student relationships prior to asking the remaining questions. 5. What strategies have you observed teachers use when developing student to student and teacher to student relationships? 6. Did the strategies observed support the development of positive relationships? How do you know? 7. What strategies for developing teacher-student relationships have you had experience implementing in the classroom? 8. Did the strategies you implemented support the development of positive relationships? How do you know? On a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the highest): 9. How confident are you in your ability to develop a positive teacher-student relationships between yourself and the students in a distance learning environment? 10. How confident are you developed positive teacher-student relationships in a distance learning environment during your student teaching practicum? DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 134 Appendix E Observation Rubric Strategy 1. Upgrade your attitude 2. Encourage Interactions 3. Get buy-in 4. Embrace clarity 5. Show your passion Actions 1. Use affirmations ___Post positive reinforcements ___Give students positive praise 2. Employ occasional small engagers ___Stand and stretch ___Pair students for small tasks 3. Give yourself permission to fail ___Make a backup plan for failure ___Note what worked and didn’t ___Forgive mistakes ___Strategize to correct errors 1. Share about yourself every day ___Family, dreams everyday life ___Find out about students every day 2. Respect students ___Never disparage or criticize a student’s culture or background ___Integrate culture & social capital into goals (ex. make all voices heard) 3. Upgrade interactive language ___Make eye contact with students ___Use language you want to hear ___Thank students for contributing 1. Accentuate student interests 2. Offer an incentive 3. Pique students’ curiosity ___Use mystery objects ___ Unusual props or secrets ___Class competition 1. Use fewer words ___Find a metaphor or analogy ___ Use body language and gestures ___ Move around the room when content needs new reference point ___Use visuals and manipulatives 2. Frame directions in positive. ___Identify the desired behavior 3. Give clear, simple directions ___Be concrete, use clear language 1. Stay active ___Move around room and gesture 2. Vary voice intentionally ___Use unpredictable voice fluctuation ___Pause 3. Keep eyes focused on students ___Make eye contact ___Be positive 4. Focus on what you want to happen ___Believe in your message ___Use positive self-talk to stay relaxed and focused DEVLOPING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING 6. Manage Mind-Body States 7. Establish a Classroom Community 8. Sustain Emotional Positivity 9. Teach Positive Social and Emotional Responses 135 1. Reduce lecture time. __Limit lecture time 2. Eliminate the “fight, flight, or freeze” response ___Emotionally safe environment: ___Never use sarcasm or put downs ___If you make a mistake, apologize to the student after class 3. Give students more control ___Encourage them to have a more vested interest in class by broadening role ___Involve them in decision making 4.Ask more compelling questions 5. Keep students in suspense 1. Adopt the Parent Role in your class ___Learn students strengths or unique talents ___Always smile to all and use personal courtesies like “please,” “thank you,” and “pardon me” 2. Form cooperative groups ___choose roles and team names, etc. ___Switch up every four to six weeks 3. Create the class glue with get to know you activities ___Use sentence stems to get to know each other such as: One thing my neighbor likes to do is…, My neighbor owns a…. 4. Help students gain social status. ___Read a powerful composition they’ve written in front of their peers ___Come up with award to students for exemplifying qualities like: creativity, enthusiasm, leadership. 1. Use emotional punctuation. 2. Provide positive classroom responses: “Thank you for jumping in!” ___ Say “yes” as much as possible! 3. Accentuate the positive 4. Use variety in your clapping celebrations 1. Model appropriate responses: Teach them what you want their behavior to be in one on one sessions…”Let me show you what I was looking and listening for” 2. Teach responses with fun activities ___i.e. Video clips depicting various behaviors of kids to identify and analyze the behaviors (adapted from Engaging Students with Poverty in Mind by Eric Jenson)